Estimation of Occupational Exposure during Ceramic Manufacturing

Document Type: Original Paper

Authors

3 Ahmad El Zomor st., Nasr city,

Abstract

Introduction: The present study investigated the relatively high concentrations of natural radionuclides in raw material that used in ceramic manufacturing, and estimated the occupational exposure due to these activity concentrations.
Material and Methods: A high-purity Germanium detector was used to determine naturally occurring radionuclides in raw materials that used in ceramic manufacturing. Activity concentrations of these materials lead to potential radiological hazards due to gamma and alpha radiation. These hazards were evaluated in the present study.
Results: Maximum activity concentrations was5844, 1065 and 41 Bq/kg for 226Ra, 232Th and 235U in powdered quartz; however, maximum activity concentration for 40K was 1868 Bq/kg in colors. These activities were observed to be exceeding the exemption limit. Pancreasreceived the lowest dose (i.e., 0.02 mSv/y), while skin received the highest dose (i.e., 0.044mSv/y). Internal hazard index (Hin) was reported as 53.74, which exceed the recommended value (Hin≤1). Alpha index was 42.4 which led to over exposure. Representative level index and excess lifetime cancer risk were 0.00062 and 0.641 respectively. The total annual external dose was 2.62 m Gy/y which led to 1.83 mSv/y effective dose. Radiological hazard due to radon inhalation was 1.53E-06 mSv/y.
Conclusion: Due to the high activity concentrations of raw materials (especially zirconium compounds) and consequently the associated high dose, specific regulations must be applied in the ceramic industry in Egypt.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. European Commission. Radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials. Radiat. Prot..1999;112(16):6-16.
  2. Xhixha G, Ahmeti A, Bezzon GP, Bitri M, Broggini C, Buso GP, et al. First characterisation of natural radioactivity in building materials manufactured in Albania. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2013;155(2):217-23.
  3. Attia TE, Shendi EH, Shehata MA. Assessment of natural and artificial radioactivity levels and radiation hazards and their relation to heavy metals in the industrial area of Port Said City, Egypt. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change. 2014;5(4):1-11.
  4. Issa SA, Alaseri SM. Determination of Natural Radioactivity and Associated Radiological Risk in Building Materials Used in Tabuk Area, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Sci. Adv. Technol. 2015;82:45-62.
  5. Wadi IA, Dirar M, Elhassan A, Abdalla WA.Study of Natural Radioactivity for Some Building Materials Used in Al Kharj Area.inter. J. of Math. & Phys. Sci. Research.2015;3 (1), 94-104.
  6. Raghu Y, Harikrishnan N, Chandrasekaran A, Ravisankar R. Assessment of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazards in some building materials used in Kilpenathur, Tiruvannamalai Dist, Tamilnadu, India. InAIP Conference Proceedings.2015; 1675(1):020047.
  7. Hofmann J, Leicht R, Wingender HJ, Wörner J. Natural radionuclide concentrations in materials processed in the chemical industry and the related radiological impact. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2000.
  8. Lust M, Realo E. Assessment of natural radiation exposure from building materials in Estonia. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. 2012;61(2).107-12.
  9. Janković MM, Rajačić M, Rakic TM, Todorović D. Natural radioactivity in imported ceramic tiles used in Serbia. Processing and Application of Ceramics. 2013;7(3):123-7.7
  10. FATHI VA, Amidi J, Hafezi S. Natural radioactivity concentration in raw materials used for manufacturing refractory products. 2007;4(4):201-4.
  11. Saridag S, Tak O, Alniacik G. Basic properties and types of zirconia: An overview. World Journal of Stomatology. 2013;2(3):40-7.
  12. Asaduzzaman K, Khandaker MU, Amin YM, Bradley DA. Natural radioactivity levels and radiological assessment of decorative building materials in Bangladesh. Indoor and Built Environment. 2016;25(3):541-50.
  13. AamidalddinSQ, AlzahraniJH, AamoudyZM, Fakeha AA, Al-Habeaddi HHM, Ibraheim NM. Study of Natural Radionuclides and its Radiation Hazard Index in Building Materials Used in Saudi Arabia. Life Science Journal. 2015;12 (2).
  14. Shittu HO, Olarinoye IO, Baba-Kutigi AN, Olukotun SF, OjoEO, Egga A. Determination of the Radiological Risk Associated with Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) at Selected Quarry Sites in Abuja FCT, Nigeria: Using Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy. world. 2015;2:3.
  15. Uosif MA. Estimation of radiological hazards of some Egyptian building materials due to natural radioactivity. International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology. 2014;7(2):63-76.
  16. Salih I, Ali S, Eisa S, Idriss H. Radiation exposure of workers in storage areas for building materials. Journal of Taibah University for Science. 2014;8(4):394-400.
  17. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Protection Against Radon-222 at Home and at Work: A Report of a Task Group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Adopted by the Commission in September 1993. Pergamon Press; 1994.
  18. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation.2010.United Nations, New York. Annex B: Exposures from Natural Radiation Sources and Annex D: Medical Radiation Exposures. 2010;1.
  19. ICRP .Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources, International Basic Safety Standards, and General Safety Requirements ICRP, No. GSR Part 3.2011;3:65–90.
  20. ICRP. The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103, Annals of the ICRP (37), Annex B. Quantities Used in Radiological Protection. 2007.
  21. Condon DJ, McLean N, Noble SR, Bowring SA. Isotopic composition (238U/235U) of some commonly used uranium reference materials. Geochimicaet Cosmochimica Acta. 2010 ;74(24):7127-43.
  22. Richter S, Alonso A, De Bolle W, Wellum R, Taylor PD. Isotopic “fingerprints” for natural uranium ore samples. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 1999;193(1):9-14.
  23. Brennecka GA, Borg LE, Hutcheon ID, Sharp MA, Anbar AD. Natural variations in uranium isotope ratios of uranium ore concentrates: Understanding the 238U/235U fractionation mechanism. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2010;291(1-4):228-33.
  24. Mathew K, Mason P, Voeks A, Narayanan U. Uranium isotope abundance ratios in natural uranium metal certified reference material 112-A. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2012;315:8-14.
  25. Fujikawa Y, Shizuma K, Ikeda E, Baba T, Yoshimoto T, Fukui M, et al. Uranium and plutonium isotope ratio measurement as a tool for environmental monitoring-experiences in Osaka, Gifu and Hiroshima, Japan. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2002;39(3):564-7.
  26. EbaidYY. Use of gamma-ray spectrometry for uranium isotopic analysis in environmental samples. Rom. Journ. Phys. 2010;55(1-2):69-74.
  27. European Commission (EUC).Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Ceramic Manufacturing Industry. 2007.
  28. Eckerman KF, Ryman JC.External Exposure to Radionuclides in Air, Water, and Soil. Federal Guidance Report No. 12, EPA Report 402-R-93-081. 1993;12.
  29. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 1990 Recommendations of the Commission. ICRP Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP, 21(1-3). 1990; (3): 295-302.
  30. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational Exposure to Refractory Ceramic Fibers. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2006.
  31. International Atomic Energy Agency. Assessing the need for radiation protection measures in work involving minerals and raw materials. IAEA; 2006.
  32. Almayahi BA, Alsaedi AK, Alasadi AH, Ali AS, Hussein RO,et al. Ceramic Rn222 exhalation rates from different countries .International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. 2014;5(1).
  33. Shoeib MY, Thabayneh KM. Assessment of natural radiation exposure and radon exhalation rate in various samples of Egyptian building materials. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 2014;7(2):174-81.
  34. Ghosh D, Deb A, Bera S, Sengupta R, Patra KK. Assessment of alpha activity of building materials commonly used in West Bengal, India. Journal of environmental radioactivity. 2008 ;99(2):316-21.
  35. Stoulos S, Manolopoulou M, Papastefanou C. Assessment of natural radiation exposure and radon exhalation from building materials in Greece. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2003 ;69(3):225-40.
  36. Msila X, Labuschagne F, Barnard W, Billing DG. Radioactive nuclides in phosphogypsum from the lowveld region of South Africa. South African Journal of Science. 2016; 112(1-2):1-5.
  37. Eissa MF, Mostafa RM, Shahin F, Hassan KF, Saleh ZA, Yahia A. Natural radioactivity for some Egyptian building material. 2008.