Evaluating the Effects of Field Size on Beam Homogeneity Coefficient in the Superficial Radiotherapy Machine Using Empirical Method and Simulation

Document Type: Original Paper

Authors

1 Nuclear Engineering Department, Azad Islamic University- Sciences and Researches Unit, Tehran, Iran

2 Biochemistry and Biophysics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

3 Biochemistry and Biophysics Department, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Rajaee Oncology Hospital, Babolsar, Iran

4 Medical Physics Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Superficial X-ray therapy is one of the most important treatment methods in radiotherapy especially in the treatment of superficial skin lesions (Up to 300 kVp). Quality of the X-ray beam that can be expressed by Half-Value Layer (HVL), are important indices for this type of treatment effective energy of photon and Homogeneity Coefficient (HC).
Materials and Methods
The HC of the superficial X-ray machine at 180 kVp was determined by an experimental method and also by simulation (EGSnrc code) and the results were compared. The exposure after the first (0.5 mmCu) and second (1 mmCu) attenuation layers were measured by Farmer dosimeter for three different field sizes. The HC was derived from these experimental data and was compared with corresponding results acquired by EGSnrc code package. The BEAMnrc code was used to transport photons and electrons at exit level of the applicator, DOSXYZnrc code for calculation of absorbed dose in the phantom, and BEAMDP for drawing the output spectra.
Results
Results showed that the mean percentage difference of errors obtained by experimental data and simulation method is 3.3% and the average energy of output spectra in 180 kVp after passing through filters and attenuation layers increases to 15.3% to 25.4%.
Conclusion
The maximum percentage difference of errors for the applied methods is higher than analogous devolves elsewhere reports which could be due to setup parameters such as SSD and field size. However, the present method has the advantage of ease of setup and matching with clinical conditions.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Johns HE, Cunningham JR, The Physics of Radiology. 4th ed. Charles C. Thomas Publisher. USA; 1-796; 1983.
  2. Khan FM, Physics of Radiation Therapy. 3rd ed. lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1-849; 2003.
  3. Chica U, Anguiano M, Lallena AM. Benchmark of penelope for low and medium energy X-rays. Phys Med. 2009;25(2):51-7.
  4. Rogers DWO, Faddegon BA, Ding GX, Ma CM, Wei J, Mackie TR. BEAM: A Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Med. Phys. 1995;22:503 – 524.
  5. Rogers D, Walters B, Kawrakow I, BEAMnrc Users Manual. 2007, National Research Council of Canada: Ottawa.
  6. Ma CM, Rogers DWO, BEAMDP Users Manual. 2006, National Research Council of Canada. p. .
  7. Nelson W, Hirayama H, Rogers D, The EGS4 Code System. 1985, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center: Stanford, California.
  8. Mainegra-Hing E, Kawrakow I. Efficient x-ray tube simulations. Med Phys. 2006;33(8):2683-90.
  9. Kawrakow I, Rogers DWO. The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. Technical Report PIRS-701, 4th printing. 2003:Ottawa, Canada: National Research Council of Canada.
  10. Kawrakow I, Rogers DWO, The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport Technical Report. 2003, National Research Council of Canada: Ottawa.
  11. Kawrakow I. Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. Med Phys. 2000;27(3):485-98.
  12. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy. 2005, IAEA technical report Series 398: Vienna.
  13. Knöös T, Rosenschöld PM, Wieslander E. Modelling of  an Orthovoltage X-ray Therapy Unit with the EGSnrc Monte Carlo Package Radiation Physics. J. Phys. 2007;Conf. Ser. (74):021009.
  14. Rogers DWO, Walters B, Kawrakow I, BEAMnrc users manual, in Technical Report PIRS 509(a)revK  2005, National Research Council of Canada: Ottawa.
  15. Walters B, Kawrakow I, Rogers DWO, DOSXYZnrc Users Manual. 2007, Ionizing Radiation Standards National Research Council of Canada: Ottawa.
  16. Kawrakow I, Rogers DW, Walters BR. Large efficiency improvements in BEAMnrc using directional bremsstrahlung splitting. Med Phys. 2004;31(10):2883-98.
  17. Kawrakow I. Electron impact ionization cross sections for EGSnrc. Med. Phys. 2002;29:1230.
  18. Ma CM, Rogers DWO, BEAMDP Users Manual. PIRS-0509(C)revA. 2009, National Research Council of Canada. p. .
  19. Aoki K, Koyama M. Measurement of backscattered x-ray spectra at the water surface in the energy range 60 kV to 120 kV. Phys. Med. Biol. 2002;47(7):1205-17.
  20. Ma CM, Rogers DWO, BEAMDP as a General-Purpose Utility, in Technical Report 2005, National Research Council of Canada: Ottawa.
  21. Taleei R, Shahriari M, Aghamiri SMR. Evaluation of FLUKA Code in Simulation and Design of X-ray Tubes for X-ray Profile. Iran J Med Phys. 2006;3:25-36.
  22. Ubrich F, Wulff J, Kranzer R, Zink K. Thimble ionization chambers in medium-energy x-ray beams and the role of constructive details of the central electrode: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(18):4893-906.
 


Volume 9, Issue 3
September and October 2012
Pages 153-160
  • Receive Date: 19 December 2011
  • Revise Date: 23 January 2012
  • Accept Date: 15 March 2012