Iranian Journal of Medical Physics

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics

Comparison of Image Quality of Low Voltage 64-slice Multidetector CT Angiography with the Standard Condition in Patients Suspected of Pulmonary Embolism

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors
Mohammad Davoodi 1
Soudabeh Belash-Abadi 2
Seyed Hossein Aalaei-Andabili 3
Ali Kabir 4
1 MD, Department of Radiology, Ahvaz Jondishapur University of Medical Sciences, Khuzestan, Iran
2 MD, Ahvaz Jondishapur University of Medical Sciences, Khuzestan, Iran
3 MD, Nikan Health Researchers Institute, Tehran, Iran
4 MD, PhD, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
10.22038/ijmp.2018.27829.1302
Abstract
Introduction: Reduction of peak kilovoltage (kV) setting has been a useful approach to d creating radiation dose; however, it may have varied effects on noise and the accuracy of diagnosis. Thus, we compared image quality between low (80 kV) and standard kilovoltage (100 kV) protocols.
Material and Methods: This triple blind non-randomized parallel quasi-experimental study was conducted on 140 cases of questionable pulmonary embolism.
Results: Image quality was twice as high as the standard protocol in the 80-kV group (odds ratio=2.08). Main, segmental, and subsegmental arteries showed significantly higher vascular enhancement (P<0.001) in the 80-kV group. Similarly, the mean number of measurable segmental arteries was significantly greater in the 80-kV group relative to the standard group. On the other hand, the mean of image noise was significantly higher in the 80-kV group in comparison with the 100-kV group (mean: 68.4 vs. 43.1; P<0.001). Finally, the mean of radiation dose received in the 80-kV group was significantly lower than that in the 100-kV group (mean: 0.94 vs. 2.43 mSv; P<0.001).
Conclusion: Lower radiation dose received and higher image quality, but worse image noise, in the 80-kV group compared to the 100-kV group present acceptable evidence in support of reduction of voltage in cases with the suspicion of pulmonary embolism. In these patients, therefore, it is recommended as a good strategy to be adopted in computed tomography angiography.
Keywords
Image Enhancement
Image Quality
Computed Tomography Angiography
Pulmonary Embolism
Radiation Dosage
Subjects
  1. Alotaibi GS, Wu C, Senthilselvan A, McMurtry MS. Secular trends in incidence and mortality of acute venous thromboembolism: the AB-VTE population-based study. The American journal of medicine. 2016;129(8):879-e19.
  2. Nijkeuter M, Hovens MM, Davidson BL, Huisman MV. Resolution of thromboemboli in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Chest. 2006 Jan 1;129(1):192-7.
  3. Kuriakose J, Patel S. Acute pulmonary embolism. Radiologic Clinics. 2010 ;48(1):31-50.
  4. Walsham AC, Roberts HC, Kashani HM, Mongiardi CN, Ng YL, Patsios DA. The use of computer-aided detection for the assessment of pulmonary arterial filling defects at computed tomographic angiography. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2008; 32(6):913-8.
  5. Moores L, Bilello KL, Murin S. Sex and gender issues and venous thromboembolism1. Clinics in chest medicine. 2004;25(2):281-97.
  6. Karimizarchi H, Chaparian A. Estimating risk of exposure induced cancer death in patients undergoing computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Radioprotection. 2017; 52(2):81-6.
  7. Chaparian A, Zarchi HK. Assessment of radiation-induced cancer risk to patients undergoing computed tomography angiography scans. International Journal of Radiation Research. 2018;16(1):107-15.
  8. Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Nicolas V. Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100-or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2007; 245(2):577-83.
  9. Szucs-Farkas Z, Schibler F, Cullmann J, Torrente JC, Patak MA, Raible S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary CT angiography at low tube voltage: intraindividual comparison of a normal-dose protocol at 120 kVp and a low-dose protocol at 80 kVp using reduced amount of contrast medium in a simulation study. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011;197(5):852-9.
  10. Suess C, Chen X. Dose optimization in pediatric CT: current technology and future innovations. Pediatric radiology. 2002;32(10):729-34.
  11. Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF. Low-kilovoltage multi–detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology. 2004; 231(1):169-74.
  12. LaBounty TM, Leipsic J, Poulter R, Wood D, Johnson M, Srichai MB, et al. Coronary CT angiography of patients with a normal body mass index using 80 kVp versus 100 kVp: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor randomized trial. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011 Nov;197(5):W860-7.
  13. Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M. CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology. 2006 ; 241(3):899-907.
  14. Albrecht MH, Bickford MW, Schoepf UJ, Tesche C, De Santis D, Eid M, et al. Beam-hardening in 70-kV Coronary CT angiography: Artifact reduction using an advanced post-processing algorithm. European journal of radiology. 2018; 101:111-7.
  15. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, Schaller S, Nikolaou K, Suess C, et al. Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. European radiology. 2005; 15(2):334-41.
  16. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Deschildre F, Duhamel A. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. Radiology. 1997; 204(1):157-63.
  17. Engelke C, Manstein P, Rummeny EJ, Marten K. Suspected and incidental pulmonary embolism on multidetector-row CT: analysis of technical and morphological factors influencing the diagnosis in a cross-sectional cancer centre patient cohort. Clinical radiology. 2006; 61(1):71-80.;25: 102–13.

 

 

 

 

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 15, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
Autumn 2018
Pages 237-242

  • Receive Date 16 December 2017
  • Revise Date 26 March 2018
  • Accept Date 27 March 2018