Optimization of Head CT Protocol to Reduce the Absorbed Dose in Eye Lenses and Thyroid: A Phantom Study

Document Type : Original Paper


1 Tehran University of medical Sciences school of Allied medical Sciences, Tehran province, Tehran, Keshavarz Blvd., Ghods Street, District 6, Farre danesh

2 Tehran University of Medical Sciences school of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran Province, Tehran, Keshavarz BLVD., Ghods Street, District 6, Farre danesh

3 Sharif University of Technology Department of Energy Engineering, Iran, Tehran province, Tehran, Azadi Street


Introduction: Utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans is increasing annually. This study aimed to reduce the absorbed dose of sensitive organs in the head (eye lenses and thyroid) and to assess changes in resultant images quality in head scans when the radiation dose is decreased.
Material and Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was examined with head protocols in both helical and sectional modes using two 16-slice CT scanners. The entrance surface dose of eye lenses and thyroid was measured with standard protocols and after reducing the mAS and kilo-voltage using thermo-luminescence dosimeters (TLDs).
Results: In sectional mode with standard protocol, the highest surface dose was 2.3 mSv1 for eye lens and 0.021 mSv for thyroid in hospital A. Moreover, in helical mode with standard protocol, the highest surface dose was 0.964 and 0.02 mSv for eye lens and thyroid in hospital B, respectively. Reducing tube current and kilovoltage decreased the dose up to 35% for eye lens and 45% for thyroid in hospital A. By the mentioned reductions a dose decrease of up to 40% was achieved for both eye lens and thyroid in hospital B. There were no considerable differences in image quality between scans with standard protocol and the protocols of reduced parameters.
Conclusion: Head CT scans with standard factors conduce to images with the best quality. It may be possible to diminish the absorbed dose up to 40% without losing information, especially in follow up head scans.


Main Subjects

  1. References


    1. Mahdavi M, Hosseinnezhad M, Vahabi Moghaddam M. Determination of radiosensitive organs in head CT for the head area. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology (Sciences). 2015; 39(3.1):441-4.
    2. Cohnen M, Fischer H, Hamacher J, Lins E, Kötter R, Mödder U. CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction. American journal of neuroradiology. 2000; 21(9):1654-60.
    3. Rehani MM, Vano E, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Kleiman NJ. Radiation and cataract. Radiation protection dosimetery. 2011; 147(1-2):300-4.
    4. McLaughlin DJ, Mooney RB. Dose reduction to radiosensitive tissues in CT. Do commercially available shields meet the users' needs?. Clinical radiology. 2004; 59(5):446-50.
    5. McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, Geise R, Gould B, Keat N, Huda W, Judy P, Kalender W, McNitt-Gray M, Morin R. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Report of AAPM Task Group. 2008; 23(23):1-28.
    6. Valentin J. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007.
    7. Chodick G, Bekiroglu N, Hauptmann M, Alexander BH, Freedman DM, Doody MM, et al. Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. American journal of epidemiology. 2008; 168(6):620-31.
    8. Recommendation by the GCRPSR .Radiation-Induced Cataracts.2009; 4-6.
    9. Sinnott B, Ron E, Schneider AB. Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications. Endocrine reviews. 2010; 31(5):756-73.
    10. Ron E, Lubin JH, Shore RE, Mabuchi K, Modan B, Pottern LM, et al. Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: a pooled analysis of seven studies. Radiation research. 1995; 141(3):259-77.
    11. Curry TS, Dowdey JE, Murry RC. Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 1990; 257-84.
    12. Tan JS, Tan KL, Lee JC, Wan CM, Leong JL, Chan LL. Comparison of eye lens dose on neuroimaging protocols between 16-and 64-section multidetector CT: achieving the lowest possible dose. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2009; 30(2):373-7.
    13. Hopper KD, Neuman JD, King SH, Kunselman AR. Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning. American journal of neuroradiology. 2001; 22(6):1194-8.
    14. Sabarudin A, Mustafa Z, Nassir KM, Hamid HA, Sun Z. Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and abdomen–pelvic CT using tube current modulation: a phantom study. Journal of applied clinical medical physics. 2015; 16(1):319-28.
    15. Cohnen M, Cohnen B, Ewen K, Teubert G, Mödder U. Dosage measurements in spiral CT examinations of the head and neck region. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 1998; 168(5):474-9.
    16. Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Gijbels F, Quirynen M, Van Steenberghe D, Bosmans H, et al. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study. Clinical oral implants research. 2001; 12(5): 473-8.
    17. Ay MR, Shahriari M, Sarkar S, Ghafarian P. Measurement of organ dose in abdomen-pelvis CT exam as a function of mA, KV and scanner type by Monte Carlo method. 2004: 187-94.
    18. Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, Thiran JP, Valley JF, Schnyder P, et al. Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. American journal of neuroradiology. 2000; 21(10):1881-4.
    19. Cakmakci E, Ozkurt H, Tokgoz S, Karabay E, Ucan B, Akdogan MP, et al. CT-angiography protocol with low dose radiation and low volume contrast medium for non-cardiac chest pain. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery. 2014; 4(5): 307.
    20. Hagtvedt T, Aaløkken T, Nøtthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A. A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. European radiology. 2003; 13(5):976-80.
    21. Bulla S, Blanke P, Hassepass F, Krauss T, Winterer JT, Breunig C, et al. Reducing the radiation dose for low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction: feasibility and image quality. European journal of radiology. 2012; 81(9):2246-50.
    22. Hiaty Abdelbagi H, D. Eltayeb Abdalla HM. Estimation of  uncertainty in TLD calibration. Sudan  Academy of  Sciences Atomic energy council.2013: 1-42.
    23. Corcuera-Solano I, McLellan AM, Doshi AH, Pawha PS, Tanenbaum LN. Whole-brain adaptive 70-kVp perfusion imaging with variable and extended sampling improves quality and consistency while reducing dose.AJN.2014: 2045-51.
    24. Shore RE, Neriishi K, Nakashima E. Epidemiological studies of cataract risk at low to moderate radiation doses:(not) seeing is believing. Radiation research. 2010; 174(6b):889-94.
    25. Schneider AB, Ron EL, Lubin J, Stovall MA, Gierlowski TC. Dose-response relationships for radiation-induced thyroid cancer and thyroid nodules: evidence for the prolonged effects of radiation on the thyroid. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1993; 77(2): 362-9.
    26. Su YP, Niu HW, Chen JB, Fu YH, Xiao GB, Sun QF. Radiation dose in the thyroid and the thyroid cancer risk attributable to CT scans for pediatric patients in one general hospital of China. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2014; 11(3): 2793-803.
    27. Bahreyni, Tousi Smt. Absorbed Dose in Thyroid and Eyes Lenses In Ct Scans of Head and Neck. Mjmums. 2002: 9-18.
    28. Hein E, Rogalla P, Klingebiel R, Hamm B. Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses with eye lens protection: effect on image quality and radiation dose. European radiology. 2002; 12(7): 1693-6.
    29. Mazonakis M, Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N. Thyroid dose from common head and neck CT examinations in children: is there an excess risk for thyroid cancer induction?. European radiology. 2007; 17(5): 1352-7.
    30. Veiga LH, Holmberg E, Anderson H, Pottern L, Sadetzki S, Adams MJ, et al. Thyroid cancer after childhood exposure to external radiation: an updated pooled analysis of 12 studies. Radiation research. 2016; 185(5): 473-84.
    31. Shore RE. Issues and epidemiological evidence regarding radiation-induced thyroid cancer. Radiation research. 1992; 131(1):98-111.
    32. Imai K, Ikeda M, Kawaura C, Aoyama T, Enchi Y, Yamauchi M. Dose reduction and image quality in CT angiography for cerebral aneurysm with various tube potentials and current settings. The British journal of radiology. 2012; 85(1017): 673-81.
    33. Udayasankar UK, Braithwaite K, Arvaniti M, Tudorascu D, Small WC, Little S, et al. Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2008 Apr 1;29(4):802-6.






Volume 16, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
January and February 2019
Pages 64-74
  • Receive Date: 28 February 2018
  • Revise Date: 16 April 2018
  • Accept Date: 02 May 2018
  • First Publish Date: 01 January 2019