Review of Geant4 Applications in Radiobiology

Document Type : Review Article


1 ِDepartment of Medical Physics,Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Rajaee, Quchan Branch, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Khorasan Razavi, Iran

3 Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran


Introduction: Ionizing radiation is widely used in industry and medicine; however, it causes a significant health hazard by making microscopic damage to living tissue. Various biological parameters, including cell survival fraction and relative biological effectiveness, are taken into account to assess the severity and extent of biological damages. Microdosimetry suffers from various shortcomings and limitations, but the development of some powerful simulation software has paved the way to resolve these problems in recent years.
Material and Methods: In this study, the authors were looked for two keywords (Geant4 and radiobiology) in the title, abstracts, and keywords of Scopus and PubMed database articles.
Results: More than 100 articles were found. The researchers extracted the articles that were devoted to the construction of different geometries for DNA, nucleus, and cells as simulate the parameters, such as relative biological effectiveness, SF, linear energy transfer, and single-strand breaks/double-strand breaks in the present study.
Conclusion: Geant4 is one of the software commonly used to simulate biological factors. It has many properties, such as the ability to follow up physical processes in very low energy, open source code, and flexibility in complex geometries. In this paper, we reviewed some of the radiobiological parameters simulated with Geant4.


Main Subjects

  1. References


    1. Rabus H. Fundamentals of Micro- and Nanodosimetry. 2011.
    2. Guatelli S. Radiotherapy Based On α Emitting Radionuclides: Geant4 for Dosimetry and Micro-/Nano-Dosimetry. 2013.
    3. Nikjoo H, Uehara S, Emfietzoglou D, Cucinotta FA. Track-structure codes in radiation research. Radiation Measurements. 2006; 41(9-10):1052-74.
    4. Butts J, Katz R. Theory of RBE for heavy ion bombardment of dry enzymes and viruses. Radiation research. 1967 Apr 1; 30(4):855-71.
    5. Dearnaley DP, Khoo VS, Norman AR, Meyer L, Nahum A, Tait D, et al. Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial. The Lancet. 1999; 353(9149):267-72.
    6. ICRU M. Report 36, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, 1983.
    7. Cucinotta FA, Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT. Applications of amorphous track models in radiation biology. Radiation and environmental biophysics. 1999; 38(2):81-92.
    8. Toossi MT, Ghorbani M, Sabet LS, Akbari F, Mehrpouyan M. A Monte Carlo study on dose enhancement and photon contamination production by various nanoparticles in electron mode of a medical linac. Nukleonika. 2015; 60(3):489-96.
    9. Toossi MT, Ghorbani M, Akbari F, Sabet LS, Mehrpouyan M. Monte Carlo simulation of electron modes of a Siemens Primus linac (8, 12 and 14 MeV). Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice. 2013; 12(4):352-9.
    10. Toossi MT, Ghorbani M, Akbari F, Mehrpouyan M, Sabet LS. Evaluation of the effect of tooth and dental restoration material on electron dose distribution and production of photon contamination in electron beam radiotherapy. Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine. 2016; 39(1):113-22.
    11. Toossi MB, Khajetash B, Ghorbani M. Assessment of Neutron Contamination Originating from the Presence of Wedge and Block in Photon Beam Radiotherapy. Journal of biomedical physics & engineering. 2018; 8(1): 3.
    12. Toossi MT, Farhood B, Soleymanifard S. Evaluation of dose calculations accuracy of a commercial treatment planning system for the head and neck region in radiotherapy. Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy. 2017; 22(5):420-7.
    13. Kyllönen JE, Girard P, Uehara S, Wilson WE, Lindborg L, Nikjoo H. Energy deposition by monoenergetic ions in cylindrical targets Monograph. MRC RAGSU. 2003.
    14. Friedland W, Jacob P, Bernhardt P, Paretzke HG, Dingfelder M. Simulation of DNA damage after proton irradiation. Radiation Research. 2003; 159(3):401-10.
    15. Friedland W, Dingfelder M, Jacob P, Paretzke HG. Calculated DNA double-strand break and fragmentation yields after irradiation with He ions. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2005; 72(2-3):279-86.
    16. Friedland W, Dingfelder M, Kundrát P, Jacob P. Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 2011; 711(1-2):28-40.
    17. Chauvie S, Francis Z, Guatelli S, Incerti S, Mascialino B, Moretto P, et al. Geant4 physics processes for microdosimetry simulation: design foundation and implementation of the first set of models. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2007; 54(6):2619-28.
    18. NIKJOO S. UEHARA WE WILSON M. HOSHI DT GOODHEAD H. Track structure in radiation biology: theory and applications. International journal of radiation biology. 1998; 73(4):355-64.
    19. Gilbert W. Towards a paradigm shift in biology. Nature. 1991; 349:99.
    20. Agostinelli S. GEANT4—a simulation toolkit. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 2003; 506(3): 250-303.
    21. Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis JE, Araujo HA, Dubois PA, Asai MA, et al. Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Transactions on nuclear science. 2006; 53(1):270-8.
    22. Chauvie S, Francis Z, Guatelli S, Incerti S, Mascialino B, Montarou G, et al. Models of biological effects of radiation in the Geant4 Toolkit. In2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 2006; 2: 803-5.
    23. Incerti S, Baldacchino G, Bernal M, et al. The Geant4-DNA project.   Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput. 2010(1):157-178..
    24. Ebrahimi Loushab M. Assesment of Nuclear Interactions and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Carbon-Ion Therapy. 2015.
    25. Larsson S. Radiation transport calculations for narrow scanned photon beams using Geant4. 2002.
    26. Chauvie S, Scielzo G. Radiotherapy treatment planning with Monte Carlo on a distributed system. In2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37515). 2003; 3: 1765-9.
    27. Cirrone GA, Cuttone G, Guatelli S, Nigro SL, Mascialino B, Pia MG, et al. Implementation of a new Monte Carlo simulation tool for the development of a proton therapy beam line and verification of the related dose distributions. In2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37515). 2009; 3:1756-8.
    28. Loushab ME, Mowlavi AA, Hadizadeh MH, Izadi R, Jia SB. Impact of Various Beam Parameters on Lateral Scattering in Proton and Carbon-ion Therapy. Journal of biomedical physics & engineering. 2015; 5(4):169.
    29. Incerti S, Barberet P, Villeneuve R, Aguer P, Gontier E, Michelet-Habchi C, et al. Simulation of cellular irradiation with the CENBG microbeam line using Geant4. In2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37515). 2003; 3: 1759-64.
    30. Huang CY, Guatelli S, Oborn B, Allen BJ. Background dose for systemic targeted alpha therapy. 2011.
    31. Raisali G. Determination of Dose-Equivalent Response of A Typical Diamond Microdosimeter in Space Radiation Fields. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2018; 15(1):39-47.
    32. Raisali G, Mirzakhanian L, Masoudi SF, Semsarha F. Calculation of DNA strand breaks due to direct and indirect effects of Auger electrons from incorporated 123I and 125I radionuclides using the Geant4 computer code. International journal of radiation biology. 2013; 89(1):57-64.
    33. Strulab D, Santin G, Lazaro D, Breton V, Morel C. GATE (Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission): a PET/SPECT general-purpose simulation platform. Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements. 2003; 125:75-9.
    34. Archambault L, Beaulieu L, Carrier JF, Castrovillari F, Chauvie S, Foppiano F, et al. Overview of Geant4 applications in medical physics. In2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37515). 2003; 3: 1743-5.
    35. Rodrigues P, Moura R, Ortigao C, Peralta L, Pia M, Trindade A, Varela J. Geant4 applications and developments for medical physics experiments. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2004; 51(4):1412-19.
    36. Šefl M, Incerti S, Papamichael G, Emfietzoglou D. Calculation of cellular S-values using Geant4-DNA: the effect of cell geometry. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2015; 104:113-23.
    37. Cai Z, Pignol JP, Chan C, Reilly RM. Cellular dosimetry of 111In using Monte Carlo N-particle computer code: comparison with analytic methods and correlation with in vitro cytotoxicity. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2010; 51(3):462-70.
    38. Tajik M, Rozatian AS, Semsarha F. Calculation of direct effects of 60Co gamma rays on the different DNA structural levels: A simulation study using the Geant4-DNA toolkit. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2015; 346:53-60.
    39. Pater P, Seuntjens J, El Naqa I, Bernal MA. On the consistency of Monte Carlo track structure DNA damage simulations. Medical physics. 2014; 41(12).
    40. Villagrasa C, Francis Z, Incerti S. Physical models implemented in the GEANT4-DNA extension of the GEANT-4 toolkit for calculating initial radiation damage at the molecular level. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2010; 143(2-4):214-8.
    41. Karamitros M, Mantero A, Incerti S, Friedland W, Baldacchino G, Barberet P, et al. Modeling radiation chemistry in the Geant4 toolkit. Progress in nuclear science and technology. 2011; 2(0): 503-8.
    42. Mantero A. Modeling Radiation Chemistry and Biology in the Geant4 Toolkit. 2010.
    43. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003; 100(24):13761-6.
    44. Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 2006.
    45. Chauvie S, Francis Z, Guatelli S, Incerti S, Mascialino B, Montarou G, et al. Monte Carlo simulation of interactions of radiation with biological systems at the cellular and DNA levels: the Geant4-DNA project. InRadiation Research. 2006; 166: 676-7.
    46. Huang CY, Oborn BM, Guatelli S, Allen BJ. Monte Carlo calculation of the maximum therapeutic gain of tumor antivascular alpha therapy. Medical physics. 2012; 39(3):1282-8.
    47. Zaider M. Evidence of a neutron RBE of 70 (+/-50) for solid-tumor induction at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and its implications for assessing the effective neutron quality factor. Health physics. 1991; 61(5):631-6.
    48. Freudenberg R, Wendisch M, Kotzerke J. Geant4-Simulations for cellular dosimetry in nuclear medicine. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 2011; 21(4):281-9.
    49. Cai Z, Kwon YL, Reilly RM. Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) modeling of the cellular dosimetry of 64Cu: comparison with MIRDcell S values and implications for studies of its cytotoxic effects. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2017; 58(2):339-45.
    50. Goddu SM. MIRD Cellular S values: Self-absorbed dose per unit cumulated activity for selected radionuclides and monoenergetic electron and alpha particle emitters incorporated into different cell compartments. Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1997.
    51. Freudenberg R, Runge R, Maucksch U, Berger V, Kotzerke J. On the dose calculation at the cellular level and its implications for the RBE of 99mTc and 123I. Medical physics. 2014; 41(6Part1).
    52. Olive PL. The role of DNA single-and double-strand breaks in cell killing by ionizing radiation. Radiation research. 1998; 150(5s):S42-51.
    53. Coghill MT. Radiobiological modeling using track structure analysis. 2012.
    54. Barendsen GW, Walter HM. Effects of different ionizing radiations on human cells in tissue culture: IV. Modification of radiation damage. Radiation research. 1964; 21(2):314-29.
    55. Dewey S.Lateral variations of radiobiological properties of therapeutic fields of 1H, 4He, 12C and 16O ions studied with Geant4 and microdosimetric kinetic model. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2017; 62(14): 5884.
    56. Chen Y, Li J, Li C, Qiu R, Wu Z. A modified microdosimetric kinetic model for relative biological effectiveness calculation. Phys. Med. Biol. 2018; 63(015008):14.
    57. Burigo L, Pshenichnov I, Mishustin I, Bleicher M. Comparative study of dose distributions and cell survival fractions for 1H, 4He, 12C and 16O beams using Geant4 and Microdosimetric Kinetic model. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2015; 60(8):3313.
    58. Kase Y, Kanai T, Matsumoto Y, Furusawa Y, Okamoto H, Asaba T, et al. Microdosimetric measurements and estimation of human cell survival for heavy-ion beams. Radiation research. 2006; 166(4):629-38.
    59. Burigo, L., et al., Comparative study of RBE and cell survival fractions for 1H, 4He, 12C and 16O beams using Geant4 and Microdosimetric Kinetic model. arXiv preprint arXiv.2014;1403: 7929.
    60. Wyckoff H.International commission of radiation units and measurements. 1975..
    61. Kase Y, Kanai T, Sakama M, Tameshige Y, Himukai T, Nose H, et al. Microdosimetric approach to NIRS-defined biological dose measurement for carbon-ion treatment beam. Journal of radiation research. 2011; 52(1):59-68.
    62. Hosseini MA, Jia SB, Ebrahimi-Loushab M. Analysis of Relative Biological Effectiveness of Proton Beams and Iso-effective Dose Profiles Using Geant4. Journal of biomedical physics & engineering. 2017; 7(2): 95.
    63. Guan F, Peeler C, Bronk L, Geng C, Taleei R, Randeniya S, et al. Analysis of the track‐and dose‐averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code. Medical physics. 2015; 42(11):6234-47.
    64. Guan F, Bronk L, Titt U, Lin SH, Mirkovic D, Kerr MD, et al. Spatial mapping of the biologic effectiveness of scanned particle beams: towards biologically optimized particle therapy. Scientific reports. 2015; 5: 9850.
    65. Huang CY, Guatelli S, Oborn BM, Allen BJ. Microdosimetry for targeted alpha therapy of cancer. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine. 2012; 2012.Seeram E, Davidson R, Bushong S, Swan H. Radiation dose optimization research: Exposure technique approaches in CR imaging: A literature review. Radiography. 2013; 19: 331-8.