Dosimetric Effects of Rotational Setup Error in Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy on Brain Tumor Patients

Document Type : Original Paper


1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul

2 Department of Radiological Technology, Ansan University, Ansan

3 Radiological Science, Gachon University Medical Campus, Incheon, Korea


Introduction: This study examined the dosimetric effects based on the rotational setup error to correct patient setup errors occur during volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) for brain tumor patients.
Material and Methods: This study included 1129 cases of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images obtained from 46 brain tumor patients, who experienced VMAT and used the 6DoF (degree of freedom) treatment couch. The dosimetric effects regarding the application of the rotational setup error were examined by comparing the treatment plans.
Results: The mean patient setup errors at the lateral (X-axis), longitudinal (Y-axis), and vertical (Z-axis) directions were 0.1±1.4, 0.0±1.1, and -0.4±1.2 mm, respectively. The pitch, roll, and yaw were -0.29±0.61°,-0.42±0.98°, and -0.53±0.69°, respectively. When an absolute value was taken for the setup error, the mean error was 1.06±0.14 mm at the three translation directions, and the error of rotation was 0.82±0.14°, showing a larger error than that of translation. In terms of the mean dose difference by each region of interest (ROI) before and after correcting for the rotational setup error on the treatment plan, Brain_max was 2.17 Gy, and Brain_mean was 0.28 Gy, whereas the maximum and mean of Brain_stem were -3.58 and -4.43 Gy, respectively. These findings suggested a dose difference according to the correction of the rotational setup error.
Conclusion: This study indicated that the dose effect is influenced by the rotational setup error in VMAT of brain tumor patients. Moreover, the 6DoF positional correction could reduce the positional uncertainties and deliver a more accurate dose.


Main Subjects

  1. References


    1. Nabavi M, Nedaie HA, Salehi N, Naderi M. Stereotactic Radiosurgery/Radiotherapy: A Historical Review. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2014 Mar 1;11(1):156-67.
    2. Burnet NG, Thomas SJ, Burton KE, Jefferies SJ. Cancer Imaging. 2004; 4, 153.
    3. Nazemi-Gelyan H, Hasanzadeh H, Makhdumi Y, Abdollahi S, Akbari F, Varshoee-Tabrizi F, et al. Evaluation of Organs at Risk’s Dose in External Radiotherapy of Brain Tumors. Iranian journal of cancer prevention. 2015 Jan;8(1):47.
    4. A. Kamali-Asl A, Batooli AH, Harriri S, Salman-Rezaee F, Shahmardan F, Yavari L. Design, Simulation and Manufacture of a Multileaf Collimator to Confirm the Target Volumes in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2010 Mar 1;7(1):65-74.
    5. ICRU REPORT. Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy (Supplement to ICRU Report 50). Bethesda (MD) : International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Report No: 62, 1999.
    6. Jeon SH, Kim JH. Positional uncertainties of cervical and upper thoracic spine in stereotactic body radiotherapy with thermoplastic mask immobilization. Radiat Oncol J. 2018;36(2):122-8.
    7. Amanpreet D, Darby E, Ian P, Justin L, Danny E, Kevin H, et al. The Impact of Correcting for Translational and Rotational Errors Using the HexaPOD in Head and Neck Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Patients. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2017;48(3):276-81.
    8. Yao L, Zhu L, Wang J, Liu L, Zhou S, Jiang S, et al. Positioning accuracy during VMAT of gynecologic malignancies and the resulting dosimetric impact by a 6-degree-of-freedom couch in combination with daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography. Radiation Oncology. 2015 Dec;10(1):104.
    9. Gevaert T, Verellen D, Engels B, Depuydt T, Heuninckx K, Tournel K, et al. Clinical Evaluation of a Robotic 6-Degree of Freedom Treatment Couch for frameless Radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(1):467–74.
    10. Remeijer P, Geerlof E, Ploeger L, Gilhuijs K, van Herk M, Lebesque JV. 3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evaluation of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2000 Mar 15;46(5):1281-90.