Quantification of Partial Volume Effects in Salivary Glands SPECT Images after Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Tumors

Document Type : Original Paper


Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Gauteng, South Africa


Introduction: Radical radiation therapy of head and neck cancers may injure the salivary glands and reduce their function. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images maybe used to evaluate function post-therapy. However, accurate quantification is hindered by the partial volume effects (PVEs). The present study involved the introduction of a PVEs quantification technique aimed at improved quantification of the salivary glands function.
Material and Methods: The parotid and submandibular salivary glands were mimicked with hollow spheres. The left parotid (LP), right parotid (RP), left submandibular (LSM), and right submandibular (RSM) salivary glands had diameters; 16, 14, 11, and 12 mm, respectively. Technetium-99m solution (activity concentration; 300 kBq/mL) filled the salivary glands prior to implanting into a hollow head and neck phantom later filled with the technetium-99m solution (activity concentration; 1440 Bq/mL). A SPECT image was acquired on 128 × 128 matrix size over 30 min and reconstructed using filtered back projection algorithm (Butterworth filter with a cut-off frequency of 0.9 cycles per pixel and an order of 9). Reconstructed images were quantified using ImageJ software.
Results: The image counts extracted from the LP, RP, RMS, and LMS salivary glands SPECT images were 672 019, 494 842, 398 091, and 262 908, respectively after the quantification of PVEs, compared to 486 320, 347 534, 272 940, and 175 307 before the quantification of PVEs. The respective quantitative errors were 27%, 29%, 31%, and 33%.
Conclusion: Quantification of PVEs allows recovery of image counts spread outside the image pixels leading to improved quantification.


Main Subjects



    1. Gupta T, Hotwani C, Kannan S, Master Z, Rangaranjan V, Murthy V, et al. Prospective longitudinal assessment of the parotid gland function using dynamic quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphy and estimation of dose-relationship of radiotherapy in head and neck. Radiation Oncology. 2015; 10:67.
    2. Cheng SC, WU VWC, Kwong DLW, Ying MTC. Assessment of post-radiotherapy salivary gland. Brit J Radiol. 2011; 84:393-402.
    3. Ahmed NS, Mansour SM, El-Wakd MM, Al-Azizi HM, Abu-Taleb NS. The value of magnetic resonance sialography and magnetic resonance imaging versus conventional sialography of the parotid gland in the diagnosis and staging of Syrogren’s syndrome. The Egyptian Rheumatologist. 2011; 33:147-54.
    4. Clarke HD, Moiseenko VV, Rackley TP, Thomas SD, W JS, Reinsberg SA. Development of a method for functional identification of parotid using dynamic constrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Imageing and concurrent stimulation. Acta Oncologia. 2015;54(9):1686-90.
    5. Jimenez - Heffernan A, Gomez – Millan J, De Mora ES, Moreno JD, Gil MM, Salgo C, et al. Quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy in the head and neck cancer patients following radiotherapy. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2010; 29(4):165-71.
    6. Knoll P, Krtla G, Bastati B, Koriska K, Mirzaei S. Improved quantification of salivary gland scintigraphy by means of factor analysis. Iran J Nucl Med. 2012; 20(1):5-10.
    7. Vinagre F, Santos Mj, Prata A, Canas da Silva J, Santos AI. Assessment of salivary glands function in Sjogren’s syndrome: salivary gland scintigraphy. Autoimmunity Reviews.  2009; 8:672-6.
    8. Dugonjić S, Stefanović D, Đurović B, Spasić V. Evaluation of diagnostic parameters from parotid and submandibular dynamic salivary glands scintigraphy and unstimulated sialometry in Sjögren’s syndrome. Hell J Nucl Med. 2014; 17(2): 116-22.
    9. Loutfi I, MD, Nair MK, Ali K. Ebrahim AK. Salivary Gland Scintigraphy: The Use of Semiquantitative Analysis for Uptake and Clearance. J Nucl Med Technol. 2003; 31:81-5.
    10. Angusti T, Pilati E, Parente A, Carignola R, Manfredi M, Cauda S, et al. Semi-quantitative analysis of salivary gland scintigraphy in Sjogren’s syndrome diagnosis: a fisrt-line tool. Clinical Investigations. 2017; 21(7):2389-95.
    11. Nyathi M, Sithole ME. Salivary glands scintigraphy with partial volume effects quantification: A phantom feasibility study. AMJ. 2017; 10(9):752-8.
    12. Lehnert W, Gregoire MC, Reilhac A, Meikle SR. Characterisation of partial volume effect and region-based correction in small animal positron emission tomography (PET) of the rat brain. Neuroimage. 2012; 61:2144-57.
    13. Erlandsson K, Buvat I, Hendrik Pretorius PH, Benjamin A, Thomas BA, Hutton BF. A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology. Phys Med Biol. 2012; 57: 119-59.
    14. Ritt P, Vija H, Hornegger J, Kuwert T. Absolute quantification in SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011; 38: 68-77. 
    15. Groch MW, Erwin WD. SPECT in the year 2000: Basic principles. J Nucl Med Technol. 2000; 28(4):233-44.
    16. M. Nyathi. Quantitative evaluation of the parotid and submandibular salivary glands function post radiation therapy of head and neck tumors. PhD thesis. Ga-Rankuwa. South Africa. 2015.
    17. Nyathi M, Sithole ME, Ramafi OE. Quantification of Partial volume effects in planar imaging. Iran J Nucl Med. 2016; 24(2):116-20.
    18. ImageJ bundled with 64-bit Java 1.8.0_112. Available from: https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/download.html.
    19. Bardies M and Buvat I. Dosimetry in nuclear medicine therapy: what are the specifics in image quantification for dosimetry? Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2011;55(1):5.