Comparison of Ultraviolet Protection Factor of Pure Cotton and Cotton Coated with Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles using the Electrospinning Method with Two Ultraviolet-C Generators

Document Type : Original Paper


1 Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Paramedicine, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Technician of Radiology Technology, Department of Radiology Technology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

3 Instructor of Medical Physics, Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

4 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.


Introduction: Protection against harmful effects of ultraviolet radiation (UV) is measured under Ultraviolet Protection Factor (UPF) scale. The utilization of protective clothing is the best way to deal with the damage caused by ultraviolet radiation. The purpose of this study was to compare the ultraviolet ray protective factor of pure cotton and cotton coated with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles using the electrospinning method with two natural and artificial generators.
Material and Methods: This is an analytical-descriptive study in which, a pure cotton fabric and a cotton fabric coated with nanoparticles of dioxiditenium were coated for 10, 20 and 40 minutes, as an example, with the titanium dioxide with two types of sunlight and artificial light (widespread and dotted) beams. UV radiation divided into three spectra A, B and C that we use UV-C to measurement. Finally, the comparison of the average UV-c radiation penetration from different fabrics were conducted. We use SPSS Ver.22 to analyze data and p-value<0.05. 
Results: The highest and the lowest amount of penetration were for pure and coated cotton fibers for 40 min of UV-C radiation, respectively. As the beam decreases, the UPF rises. In nano-coated fabrics, the amount of beam penetration is lower and absorption is higher giving higher UPF.
Conclusion: Due to the very low UPF, cotton fabrics are not suitable for utilization in areas with UV radiation. Therefore, in order to protect against UV radiation, fabrics coated with TiO2 nanoparticles can be used in the domain of health care.


Main Subjects



    1. Sosa IO, Noguez C, Barrera RG. Optical properties of metal nanoparticles with arbitrary shapes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2003;107(26):6269-75.
    2. Airey DK, Wong JC, Fleming RA, Meldrum LR. An estimate of the total UV-B exposure for outdoorworkers during a south-east Queensland summer. Health physics. 1997;72(4):544-9.
    3. Lucas RM, McMichael AJ, Armstrong BK, Smith WT. Estimating the global disease burden due to ultraviolet radiation exposure. International journal of epidemiology. 2008;37(3):654-67.
    4. ICNIRP. ICNIRP statement on far infrared radiation exposure, Health Physics Society; 2006.
    5. Morison WL. Photoprotection by clothing. Dermatologic Therapy. 2003;16(1):16-22.
    6. Ghaderi-Far F, Soltani A, Miri AA. Modeling phonological development in cotton. Journal of Plant Production. 2012;19(1): 107-26.
    7. Yuen C, Ku S, Kan C, Cheng Y, Choi P, Lam Y. Using nano-tio 2 as co-catalyst for improving wrinkle-resistance of cotton fabric. Surface review and letters. 2007;14(04):571-5.
    8. Hosseini S, Tabibi A, Sadeghi A, Afkhami GR. Estimation of open-end cotton yarn strength from fiber physical characteristics. 2004.
    9. Bigdeli AH, Eskandari M, Fattahi-Asl J. Transmission rate and ultraviolet protection factor of five different fibers against ultraviolet radiation. Jundi Shapour Medical Science Journal. 2015;14(01):41-51.
    10. Gambichler T, Rotterdam S, Altmeyer P, Hoffmann K. Protection against ultraviolet radiation by commercial summer clothing: need for standardised testing and labelling. BMC dermatology. 2001;1(1):6.
    11. Hoffmann K, Laperre J, Avermaete A, Altmeyer P, Gambichler T. Defined UV protection by apparel textiles. Archives of Dermatology. 2001;137(8):1089-94.
    12. Menter JM, Hatch KL. Clothing as solar radiation protection. Textiles and the skin. 31: Karger Publishers. 2003; 31: 50-63.
    13. Das BR. UV radiation protective clothing. Open Textile Journal. 2010;3:14-21.
    14. Lu H, Fei B, Xin JH, Wang R, Li L. Fabrication of UV-blocking nanohybrid coating via miniemulsion polymerization. Journal of colloid and interface science. 2006;300(1):111-6.
    15. Payne S, inventor; Microban Products Co, assignee. Antimicrobial super finish and method of making. United States patent application US 10/467,356. 2004 Apr 22.
    16. Bhave R. Synthesis and photocatalysis study of brookite phase titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Clemson University. 2007.
    17. Mosteo R, Kiwi J, Yuranova T, Bandara J, Laub D. Self-cleaning cotton textiles surfaces modified by photoactive SiO2/TiO2 coating. 2006.
    18. Zare-Hossein-abadi D, Ershad-Langroudi A, Rahimi A. Preparation of anatase nanoparticles thin film coatings by sol-gel method at low temperature and investigation of their photocatalytic activities. J Color Sci Technol. 2009; 3:121-9.
    19. Seifolahzadeh S, Montazer M. Self-cleaning of methylene blue and acid blue 113 on wool/polyester fabric treated with nano titanium oxide under UV irradiation without yellowing. J Color Sci Technol. 2010;4:115-23.
    20. Sundaresan K, Sivakumar A, VigneswaranC, Ramachandran T. Influence of nano titanium dioxide finish, prepared by sol-gel technique, on the ultraviolet protection, antimicrobial, and self-cleaning characteristics of cotton fabrics. Journal of Industrial Textiles. 2012;41(3):259-77.
    21. Hatch KL, Osterwalder U. Garments as solar ultraviolet radiation screening materials. Dermatologic clinics. 2006;24(1):85-100.
    22. Aliabadi A, Hesam G, Moradpour Z. Study of occupational exposure to non-ionizing radiations and the effectiveness of personal protective equipment in common arc welding processes. Journal of Ergonomics. 2016; 2(4): 1-10.