Investigation of LINAC Structural Effects on Photoneutron Specified Parameters Using FLUKA code

Document Type : Original Paper


Department of Medical Radiation Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran


Introduction: The utilization of high-energy photons in the medical linear accelerator can lead to photoneutron production. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the physical components of the head, including flattening filter (FF) andmultileaf collimator (MLC), as well as the dependence of therapeutic field size on the photoneutron spectrum, dose, and flux.
Material and Methods: The present study reported the simulation of the fundamental linac head components of the Varian Clinac 2100 performing in X-ray mode with 18 MV energy by the FLUKA code. The percentage depth dose and lateral dose profile were measured using a PTW thimble chamber to ensure the simulation reliability.
Results: Photoneutron spectrum analysis indicated that neutrons with highest relative biological effectiveness were delivered to the phantom surface, and opening the field from 0×0 to 40×40  shifted the spectrum by 24.545% to the higher energies. The target and the vicinity parts played the most prominent roles in neutron contamination. The relationship between the field size and the photoneutron dose was non-linear, and it reached a peak of 20×20 . Although using small fields formed by the MLC contribute to a lower dose compared to those shaped by the jaws, MLC-equipped machines result in 21.98% higher dose. Moreover, the flattening filter removal unexpectedly increased the isocenter photoneutron dose by 11.63%. This undesirable dose can be up to 2.54 mSv/Gy for the reference field at the isocenter while the out-of-field dose is about 0.5 mSv/Gy for most of the field dimensions.
Conclusion: As a result, it is critical to consider this unwanted absorbed dose, which is seriously influenced by the implemented therapeutic conditions.


Main Subjects



    1. Chilton AB, Shultis JK, Faw RE. Principles of radiation shielding. 1984.
    2. Biltekin F, Yeginer M, Ozyigit G. Investigating in-field and out-of-field neutron contamination in high-energy medical linear accelerators based on the treatment factors of field size, depth, beam modifiers, and beam type. Physica Medica. 2015 Jul 1;31(5):517-23.
    3. Konefał A, Orlef A, Bieniasiewicz M. Measurements of neutron radiation and induced radioactivity for the new medical linear accelerator, the Varian TrueBeam. Radiation Measurements. 2016 Mar 1;86:8-15.
    4. Sheikh‐Bagheri D, Rogers DW. Monte Carlo calculation of nine megavoltage photon beam spectra using the BEAM code. Medical physics. 2002 Mar;29(3):391-402.
    5. Bednarz B, Xu XG. Monte Carlo modeling of a 6 and 18 MV Varian Clinac medical accelerator for in-field and out-of-field dose calculations: development and validation. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2009 Jan 14;54(4):N43.
    6. Yücel H, Çobanbaş İ, Kolbaşı A, Yüksel AÖ, Kaya V. Measurement of photo-neutron dose from an 18-MV medical linac using a foil activation method in view of radiation protection of patients. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2016 Apr 1;48(2):525-32.
    7. Najem MA, Abolaban FA, Podolyák Z, Spyrou NM. Neutron production from flattening filter free high energy medical linac: A Monte Carlo study. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2015 Nov 1;116:176-80.
    8. Cardenas CE, Nitsch PL, Kudchadker RJ, Howell RM, Kry SF. Out‐of‐field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators. Journal of applied clinical medical physics. 2016 Jul;17(4):442-55.
    9. Yani S, Tursinah R, Rhani MF, Soh RC, Haryanto F, Arif I. Neutron contamination of Varian Clinac iX 10 MV photon beam using Monte Carlo simulation. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2016 Mar (Vol. 694, No. 1, p. 012020). IOP Publishing.
    10. Ma A, Awotwi-Pratt J, Alghamdi A, Alfuraih A, Spyrou N. Monte Carlo study of photoneutron production in the Varian Clinac 2100C linac. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2007 Nov 24;276(1):119-23.
    11. Kry SF, Johnson JL, White RA, Howell RM, Kudchadker RJ, Gillin MT. Neutron‐induced electronic failures around a high‐energy linear accelerator. Medical physics. 2011 Jan;38(1):34-9.
    12. Zecchin M, Morea G, Severgnini M, Sergi E, Baratto Roldan A, Bianco E, et al. Malfunction of cardiac devices after radiotherapy without direct exposure to ionizing radiation: mechanisms and experimental data. Ep Europace. 2015 Sep 1;18(2):288-93.
    13. Marbach JR, Sontag MR, Van Dyk J, Wolbarst AB. Management of radiation oncology patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers: Report of AAPM Task Group No. 34. Medical physics. 1994 Jan;21(1):85-90.
    14. Horst F, Czarnecki D, Zink K. The influence of neutron contamination on dosimetry in external photon beam radiotherapy. Medical physics. 2015 Nov;42(11):6529-36.
    15. Juste B, Morató S, Miró R, Verdú G, Díez S. MCNP6 unstructured mesh application to estimate the photoneutron distribution and induced activity inside a linac bunker. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2017 Aug 1;137:18-22.
    16. Kry SF, Titt U, Followill D, Pönisch F, Vassiliev ON, White RA, et al. A Monte Carlo model for out‐of‐field dose calculation from high‐energy photon therapy. Medical physics. 2007 Sep;34(9):3489-99.
    17. Jahangiri M, Hejazi P, Hashemi SM, Haghparast A, Hajizadeh B. The effect of field size and distance from the field center on neutron contamination in medical linear accelerator. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research (IJABBR). 2015 Jan 1;3(1):97-104.
    18. Alem-Bezoubiri A, Bezoubiri F, adreddine A, Mazrou H, Lounis-Mokrani Z. Monte Carlo estimation of photoneutrons spectra and dose equivalent around an 18 MV medical linear accelerator. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2014 Apr 1;97:381-92.
    19. Sumini M, Isolan L, Cucchi G, Sghedoni R, Iori M. A Monte Carlo model for photoneutron generation by a medical LINAC. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2017 Nov 1;140:345-8.
    20. Hakimi A, Sohrabi M, Rabie Mahdavi S. Effects of field size and depth on photoneutron dose equivalent distributions in an 18 MV X-ray medical accelerator. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2017 Mar 1;176(4):354-64.
    21. Nedaie HA, Darestani H, Banaee N, Shagholi N, Mohammadi K, Shahvar A, et al. Neutron dose measurements of Varian and Elekta linacs by TLD600 and TLD700 dosimeters and comparison with MCNP calculations. Journal of medical physics/Association of Medical Physicists of India. 2014 Jan;39(1):10.
    22. ICRP Publication 74. Conversion Coefficients for use in Radiological Protection against External Radiation. 1997.
    23. Howell RM, Ferenci MS, Hertel NE, Fullerton GD. Investigation of secondary neutron dose for dynamic MLC IMRT delivery. Medical physics. 2005 Mar;32(3):786-93.
    24. Kry SF, Titt U, Pönisch F, Followill D, Vassiliev ON, Allen White R, et al. A Monte Carlo model for calculating out‐of‐field dose from a Varian beam. Medical physics. 2006 Nov;33(11):4405-13.
    25. Vega-Carrillo HR, Martinez-Ovalle SA, Lallena AM, Mercado GA, Benites-Rengifo JL. Neutron and photon spectra in LINACs. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2012 Dec 1;71:75-80.
    26. Ezzati A, Studenski M. Neutron dose in and out of 18MV photon fields. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2017; 122: 186-92.
    27. Böhlen TT, Cerutti F, Chin MP, Fassò A, Ferrari A, Ortega PG, et al. The FLUKA code: developments and challenges for high energy and medical applications. Nuclear data sheets. 2014 Jun 1;120:211-4.
    28. Ferrari A, Sala PR, Fasso A, Ranft J. FLUKA: A multi-particle transport code (Program version 2005). 2005.
    29. Patil BJ, Chavan ST, Pethe SN, Krishnan R, Bhoraskar VN, Dhole SD. Estimation of neutron production from accelerator head assembly of 15 MV medical LINAC using FLUKA simulations. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2011 Dec 15;269(24):3261-5.
    30. Najem MA, Spyrou NM, Podolyák Z, Abolaban FA. The physical characteristics of the 15 MV Varian Clinac 2100C unflattened beam. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2014 Feb 1;95:205-9.
    31. Brkić H, Ivković A, Kasabašić M, Sovilj MP, Jurković S, Štimac D, et al. The influence of field size and off-axis distance on photoneutron spectra of the 18 MV Siemens Oncor linear accelerator beam. Radiation Measurements. 2016 Oct 1;93:28-34.
    32. Martinez-Ovalle SA, Barquero R, Gomez-Ros JM, Lallena AM. Neutron dose equivalent and neutron spectra in tissue for clinical linacs operating at 15, 18 and 20 MV. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2011 Jan 12;147(4):498-511.
    33. Mao XS, Kase KR, Johnsen S, Liu JC, Nelson WR, Kleck JH. Neutron sources in the Varian Clinac 2100C/2300C medical accelerator calculated by the EGS4 code. Health Phys.. 1996;72(SLAC-PUB-7077):524-9.
    34. Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Nath R, et al. AAPM's TG‐51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high‐energy photon and electron beams. Medical physics. 1999 Sep 1;26(9):1847-70.
    35. Bezak E, Takam R, Marcu LG. Peripheral photon and neutron doses from prostate cancer external beam irradiation. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2015 Jan 5;167(4):591-601.
    36. Expósito MR, Sánchez-Nieto B, Terrón JA, Domingo C, Gómez F, Sánchez-Doblado F. Neutron contamination in radiotherapy: Estimation of second cancers based on measurements in 1377 patients. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2013 May 1;107(2):234-41.