Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels and Estimation of Effective Dose from Computed Tomography Head Scans at a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa

Document Type : Original Paper

Author

Department of Medical Physics Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University SouthAfrica

Abstract

Introduction: Head scans are the most frequently performed computed tomography (CT) examinations worldwide. However, there is growing concern over the probability of increased cancer risks among the exposed populations. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) identify radiation dose that is not commensurate with clinical objectives. The aim of this study was to establish DRLs for CT head procedures and estimate effective dose (ED).
Material and Methods: The dose absorbed by the head slice of a Rando Alderson phantom was measured using calibrated lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) exposed to a CT scanner operated on clinical parameters. The measurements were done at the periphery and center of the slice, and repeated twice with a new set of TLDs. The radiation dose absorbed by the TLDs was read using a Harshaw TLD reader, Model 5500. The measured doses were used to calculate the weighted CT dose index (CTDIw), CT dose index volume (CTDIv), and dose length product (DLP). Finally, the ED was calculated using the formula; ED = k × DLP, where k was considered as 0.0021.
Results: The mean absorbed dose was 30.9 mGy, while the established CTDIv and DLP values for the head protocol were 40 mGy and 990 mGy.cm, respectively. Additionally, the ED was calculated as 2.1 mSv. These values compared well with some international values.
Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, the established CTDIv, DLP, and ED for head scan were well-compared with some international values, except in the cases using different scan lengths and scanner algorithms.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. References

     

    1. Liang CR, Chen PX, Kapur J, Ong MK, Quek ST, Kapur SC. Establishment of institutional diagnostic reference level for computed tomography with automated dose-tracking software. J Med Radiat Sci. 2017; 64:82-9.
    2. Damilakis J. How to measure CT doses. ESR EuroSafe Imaging - Experts & Partners. Available from: http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/How-to-measure-the-dose-in-CT_Damilakis.pdf.
    3. Limchareon S, Kaowises K, Saensawas W. Management of radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: an experience at burapha university hospital, Thailand. Radiol Diagn Imaging. 2018; 2(1): 1-4. DOI: 10.15761/RDI.1000123.
    4. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdom WE. Estimated risks of Radiation induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT. AJR. 2001;176:289-96.
    5. Power SP, Moloney F, Towey M, James K, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM. Computed Tomography and patient risks: Facts, perceptions and uncertainties. World J Radiol. 2016; 8(12):902-12.
    6. Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know. Pediatrics. 2003; 112(4).
    7. Kalra MK, Sodickson AD, Mayo-Smith WW. CT radiation: key concepts for gentle and wise use. Radiographics. 2015;35(6):1706-21.
    8. Okeji MC, Ibrahim NS, Geoffrey L, Abukar F, Ahamed A. Evaluation of absorbed dose and Protocols during brain Computed Tomography scans in Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. World J Med Sci. 2016;13(4):251-4.
    9. Tsushima Y, Taketomi-Takahashi A, Takei H, Otake H, Endo K. Radiation exposure from CT examinations in Japan. BMC medical imaging. 2010;10(1):24.
    10.  Chipiga L, Vodovatov A, Golikov V, Zvonova I, Bernhardsson C. Potential for the establishment of national CT diagnostic reference levels in the Russian Federation. InInternational Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine. 2017; 11:15.
    11. Wardlaw GM. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs): Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs: Concepts, Canada, and Constraints Concepts, COMP Winter Imaging School COMP Winter Imaging School. 2017. Available from: http://www.comp-ocpm.ca/download.php?id=1137.
    12. Van der Molen AJ, Schilham A, Stoop P, Prokop M, Geleijns J. A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands. Insights into imaging. 2013;4(3):383-90.
    13. Lindell B, Dunster HJ, Valentin J. International Commission on Radiological Protection: History, policies, procedures. Swedish Radiation Protection Institute (SSI).1998.
    14. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 1996; 26(2):1-47. [Corrected version: Ann ICRP 1997; 27(2):61].
    15. Janbabanezhad Tooria A, Shabestani-Monfared A, Deevband MR, Abdi R, Nabahati. Dose assessment in computed tomography examination. J Biomed Physics Eng. 2015; 5(4).
    16. International Electrotecnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment – part. 2–44: particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC-60601-2-44. Geneva: IEC; 2002.
    17. Suliman II, Abdalla SE, Ahmed NA, Galal MA, Isam Salih I. Survey of computed tomography technique and radiation dose in Sudanese hospitals. Euro J Radiol. 2011;80: 544– 51.
    18. Leswick DA, Syed NS, Dumaine CS, Lim HJ, Fladeland DA. Radiation dose from diagnostic computed tomography in Saskatchewan. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2009;60(2):71-8.
    19. Knipe H, Johanes J. Effective dose. 2019. Available from: https//radiopedia.org/articles/effective dose.
    20. Literature review of CT practices, risks estimations and epidemiologic cohort study proposal. Environ Biophy. 2012; 51:103-11
    21. ICRP Publication. 102 Managing Patient Dose in Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT). SAGE Publications Ltd. 2008.
    22. Toosi MTB, Gholamhosseinian H, Noghreiyan AV. Assessment of the effects of radiation type and energy type on the Calibration of TLD-100. Iran J Med Phys. 2018; 15: 140-5.
    23. Ebrahimi Tazehmahalleh F, Gholamhosseinian H, Layegh M, Ebrahimi Tazehmahalleh N, Esmaily H. Determining rectal dose through cervical cancer radiotherapy by 9 MV photon beam using TLD and XR type T GAFCHROMIC® Film 5. Iran J Radiat Res. 2008;129:134. 
    24. Burke Burke K, Sutton D. Optimization and Deconvolution of Lithium Fluoride TLD-100 in Diagnostic radiology. Brit J Radiol. 1997; 70(1779): 261-71.
    25. Najafi M, Deevband MR, Ahmadi M, Kardan MR. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for multi-detector computed tomography examination in Iran. Australas Phys Sci Med. 2015; 38:603-9.
    26. Janbabanezhad RA, Shabestani-Monfared A. Deevbad MR, Abdi R, Nabahati M. Dose Assessment in computed Tomography Examination and establishment of diagnostic reference levels in Mazandaran, Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2015;5(4):177-83.
    27. Cho PK, Seo BK, Choi TK. The Development of a diagnostic rreference level on patient dose for CT in Korea. Radiation protection Dosimetry. 2007:1-6.
    28.  Tavakoli MB, Heydari K, Jafari S. Evaluation of Diagnostic reference levels for CT scan in Isfan. Global Journal of Medicne Research and Studies. 2014;1(4):130-4
    29. Saravanakumar A, Vaideki K, Govindarajan KN, Devanand B, Jayakumar S, Sharma SD. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in select procedures in South India. International Journal of Radiation Research. 2016;14(4):341-7.
    30. Muhogora WE, Nyanda AM, Ngoye WM, Shao D. Radiation doses to patients during selected CT procedures at four hospitals in Tanzania. European journal of radiology. 2006;57(3):461-7.
    31. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. Doses from computed tomography examinations in UK-2003 review. Report NRPB-W67 NRPB, Chilton, UK. 2005.
    32. Aldrich JE, Balawich AM, Mayo JR. Radiation doses to patients receiving computed tomography examinations in British Colombia. Can Assoc Radil J. 2006;57:79-5.
    33. European Commission. Radiation Protection 109. Guidance on diagnostic levels (DRLs) for medical exposures. Office for official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg. 1999.
    34. Leswick DA, Syed NS, Dumaine CS, Lim HJ, Fladeland DA. Radiation dose from diagnostic computed tomography in Saskatchewan. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2009;60(2):71-8.
    35. Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, et al. Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. European radiology. 2003;13(8):1979-91.

     

     

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 17, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
March and April 2020
Pages 99-106

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 17 April 2019
  • Revise Date: 18 June 2019
  • Accept Date: 19 June 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics