A Study of the Impact of TRS-483 Recommended Correction Factors for Dosimetry of Small Fields in Flattening Filter Free Beams used in TrueBeam Linear Accelerators

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

1 1. R&D, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India 3. Aster Medcity, Kochi, Kerala, India

2 Rajaji Hospital & Madurai Medical College, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India

3 Aster Medcity, Kochi, Kerala, India

Abstract

Introduction: To study the effect of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) TRS-483 recommended beam quality correction factor in reference dosimetry and to examine the recommended field output correction factor for relative dosimetry of 6-MV flattening filter free (FFF) small fields, used in a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator (LINAC).
Material and Methods: The beam quality and field output correction for 6-MV FFF beams were adopted from the TRS-483 protocol. Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of the output factor was performed using the PENELOPE-based PRIMO software and compared with the TRS-483 corrected output factors. Two analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) models in the EclipseTM treatment planning system (TPS) were created; one with an output factor taken as the ratio of meter readings and one with an output factor obtained by multiplying the TRS-483 correction factor by the ratio of meter readings. Besides, box field and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans were created for both AAA models for verification and validation. The patient-specific quality assurances (QA) for ten different targets were performed, and deviations between the measured and TPS-calculated point doses in both models were examined.
Results: Separate beam quality correction factors for FFF beams in the TRS-483 protocol only resulted in an improvement of 0.1% in reference dosimetry. The TRS-483 corrected output factor was in a better agreement with the MC-calculated output factor. For a patient-specific QA of DCA plans, the output factor-corrected AAA dose calculation algorithm showed a better agreement between the measured and simulated doses. Also, there was a smaller deviation (1.2%) for the smallest target of 0.23 cc (8 mm equivalent sphere diameter) used in this study.
Conclusion:The field output factors for the LINAC small beams can be improved by incorporating the TRS-483 correction factors. However, the extent of improvement that can be expected depends on the source model of the calculation algorithm and how these well-generalized corrections are suitable for user beams and detectors.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Georg D, Knöös T, McClean B. Current status and future perspective of flattening filter free photon beams. Med Phys. 2011 Feb 15; 38:1280–93.
  2. Lang S, Shrestha B, Graydon S, Cavelaars F, Linsenmeier C, Hrbacek J;, et al. Clinical application of flattening filter free beams for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Feb;106(2):255‐259.
  3. Mamballikalam G, Senthilkumar S, Jaon bos RC, Ahamed Basith PM, Jayadevan PM. Stereotactic radiotherapy for small and very small tumours (≤1 to ≤3 cc): Evaluation of the influence of volumetric-modulated arc therapy in comparison to dynamic conformal arc therapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy as a function of flattened and unflattened beam models. J Radiother Pract. 2020 Jan 13, 1-7.
  4. Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq MS, Kanai T,Laitano F,; et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Vienna: IAEA TRS-398; 2001.
  5. Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Nath R;, et al. AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med. Phys.1999 Sep 1; 26:1847–1870.
  6. Derreumaux S, Etard C, Huet C, Trompier F, Clairand I, Bottollier JF;, et al. Lessons from recent accidents in radiation therapy in France. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2008 Aug 25; 131:130–135.
  7. Das IJ, Ding GX, Ahnesjö A. Small fields: nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. Med Phys. 2008 Dec 20;35(1):206‐215.
  8. Mamballikalam G, Senthilkumar S, Jayadevan PM, Jaon bos RC, Ahamed Basith PM, Inippully R,; et al. Evaluation of dosimetric parameters of small fields of 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam measured using various detectors against Monte Carlo simulation. J Radiother Pract. 2020 March 9; 1-8.
  9. Francescon P, Cora S, Cavedon C. Total scatter factors of small beams: a multidetector and Monte Carlo study. Med Phys. 2008 Jan 15; 35:504–13.
  10. Alfonso R, Andreo P, Capote R, Huq MS, Kilby W, Kjäll P;, et al. A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields. Med Phys. 2008 Nov;35(11):5179‐5186.
  11. Pantelis E, Moutsatsos A, Zourari K, Kilby W, Antypas C, Papagiannis P,; et al. On the implementation of a recently proposed dosimetric formalism to a robotic radiosurgery system. Med Phys. 2010 Apr 29;37(5):2369–79.
  12. Ralston A, Liu P, Warrener K, McKenzie D, Suchowerska N. Small field diode correction factors derived using an air core fibre optic scintillation dosimeter and EBT2 film. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Apr 13; 57:2587–602.
  13. Lechner W, Palmans H, Sölkner L, Grochowska P, Georg D. Detector comparison for small field output factor measurements in flattening filter free photon beams. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Nov 18;109(3):356‐360.
  14. Benmakhlouf H, Sempau J, Andreo P. Output correction factors for nine small field detectors in 6 MV radiation therapy photon beams: a PENELOPE Monte Carlo study. Med Phys. 2014 Apr 1; 41(4):041711.
  15. Azangwe G, Grochowska P, Georg D, Izewska J , Hopfgartner J, Lechner W,; et al. Detector to detector corrections: a comprehensive experimental study of detector specific correction factors for beam output measurements for small radiotherapy beams. Med Phys. 2014 Jun 20;41(7):072103.
  16. Aspradakis MM, Byrne JP, Palmans H, Duane S, Conway J, Warrington AP,; et al. Small field MV photon dosimetry. IPEM report 103. 2010; IAEA: CN-182.
  17. Das IJ, Morales J, Francescon P. Small field dosimetry: What have we learnt? AIP Conference Proceedings; 2016; 1747:060001.
  18. Scott AJD, Nahum AE, Fenwick JD. Monte Carlo modeling of small photon fields: quantifying the impact of focal spot size on source occlusion and output factors, and exploring miniphantom design for small-field measurements. Med Phys. 2009 Jun 12; 36: 3132–44.
  19. Scott AJD, Kumar S, Nahum AE, Fenwick JD. Characterizing the influence of detector density on dosimeter response in non-equilibrium small photon fields. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jun 22; 57: 4461–76.
  20. Fenwick JD, Kumar S, Scott AJD, Nahum AE. Using cavity theory to describe the dependence on detector density of dosimeter response in non-equilibrium small fields. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Apr 11;58: 2901–23.
  21. IAEA, AAPM. Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for reference and relative dose determination. Technical reports series no. 483. Vienna: IAEA; 2017.
  22. Huq MS, Hwang MS, Teo TP, Jang SY, Heron DE, Lalonde RJ. A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA‐AAPM TRS 483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS‐398, AAPM TG 51, and TG 51 Addendum protocols. Medical physics. 2018 Sep;45(9):4257-73.Huq MS, Hwang MS, Teo TP, Jang SY, Heron DE, Lalonde RJ. A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA-AAPM TRS483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS-398, AAPM TG51, and TG51 Addendum protocols. Med Phys. 2018 Jul 15;10.1002/mp.13092.
  23. British Institute of radiology. Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy. BJR Supplement 25. London: British institute of radiology; 1996.
  24. Khan FM, Gibbons JP. The physics of radiation therapy. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
  25. Rodriguez M, Sempau J, Brualla L. PRIMO: a graphical environment for the Monte Carlo simulation of Varian and Elekta linacs. Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Sep 6;189(10):881‐886.
  26. Gete E, Duzenli C, Milette MP, Mestrovic A, Hyde D, Bergman AM;, et al. A Monte Carlo approach to validation of FFF VMAT treatment plans for the TrueBeam linac. Med Phys. 2013 Jan 15;40(2):021707.
  27. Belosi MF, Rodriguez M, Fogliata A, Cozzi L  Sempau J , Clivio A,; et al. Monte Carlo simulation of TrueBeam flattening-filter-free beams using varian phase-space files: comparison with experimental data. Med Phys. 2014 Apr 17;41(5):051707.
  28. Sievinen J, Ulmer W, Kaissl W. AAA photon dose calculation model in Eclipse. Palo Alto (CA): Varian Medical Systems; 2005. [RAD #7170B].. 2005;118:2894.
  29. Torsti T, Korhonen L, Petäjä V. Using Varian photon beam source model for dose calculation of small fields. Clinical Perspectives. Helsinki, Finland: Varian Medical Systems; 2013.
  30. Li XA, Soubra M, Szanto J, Gerig LH. Lateral electron equilibrium and electron contamination in measurements of head-scatter factors using miniphantoms and brass caps. Med Phys. 1995 Jul;22(7):1167‐1170.

 

 

 

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 18, Issue 3
May and June 2021
Pages 178-186

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 19 June 2020
  • Accept Date: 23 June 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics