Establishing local Diagnostic Reference Level for Adult Patients in Computed Tomography Examination in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

1 Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 1. Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 2. Ionizing and Nonionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, the absorbed dose of patients is on the rise due to the widespread use of computed tomography (CT) during the diagnosis process. Patients' doses for similar procedures are very different due to diversity in scanners and protocols. Hence, the purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic reference levels for routine CT scan procedures in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province, Iran.
Material and Methods: In this study, four common brain, sinus, chest and abdominopelvic procedures (overall 200 scans) in spiral mode were selected in five CT centers of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province, Iran. Next, the doses were measured in head and body phantom, based on scan parameters of ten patients in each procedure at each centers (200scans). Then, the third quartile of CTDIw was considered as the diagnostic reference dose. Finally, considering the pitch factor and the mean scan length in each protocol, the diagnostic reference level values based on the third quartile of the dose length product (DLP) and volume CTDI (CTDIvol) were determined.
Results: The dose reference level values according to CTDIw third quartile in the brain, sinus, chest and abdominopelvic procedures were 39.82, 20.88, 14.10 and 17.07 mGy, respectively. In terms of dose length product, the diagnostic reference level values in the above procedures were determined to be 702.75, 243.90, 422.02, 865.62 mGy.cm, respectively.
Conclusion: The DRLs of the CTDIW, DLP and CTDIvol of brain and sinus scans calculated in this study, were comparable to other provinces, national DRL and eight other countries. However, the same quantities for the chest and abdominopelvic scans showed higher values compared to the mentioned studies, suggesting lowering mAs and increasing pitch number for patient’s dose optimization. In some centers to preserve image quality, it is necessary to optimize radiation conditions, especially for chest and abdominopelvic scans.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Tsapaki V, Rehani M. Dose management in CT facility. Biomedical imaging and intervention journal. 2007;3(2):e43. DOI: 10.2349/biij.3.2.e43
  2. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;357(22):2277-84.
  3. Shrimpton P, Hillier M, Lewis M, Dunn M. Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK-2003 review: NRPB Chilton; 2005.
  4. ICRP. ICRP Publication 73: Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine: Elsevier Health Sciences; 1996
  5. Parsi M, Sohrabi M, Mianji F, Paydar R. Determination of examination-specific diagnostic reference level in computed tomography by a new quality control-based dose survey method. Health physics. 2018;114(3):273-81.
  6. Seeram E, Sil J. Computed Tomography: Physical Principles, Instrumentation, and Quality Control.  Practical SPECT/CT in Nuclear Medicine: Springer. 2013; 77-107.
  7. Bushberg JT, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  8. McLean D, Malitz N, Lewis S. Survey of effective dose levels from typical paediatric CT protocols. Australasian radiology. 2003;47(2):135-42.
  9. Vañó E, Miller D, Martin C, Rehani M, Kang K, Rosenstein M, et al. ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Annals of the ICRP. 2017;46(1):1-144.
  10. Vassileva J, Rehani MM, Applegate K, Ahmed NA, Al-Dhuhli H, Al-Naemi HM. IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols. European radiology. 2013;23(3):623-31.
  11. Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun F, Samara E, Stuessi A, Trueb PR. Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2010;142(2-4):244-54.
  12. Simantirakis G, Hourdakis C, Economides S, Kaisas I, Kalathaki M, Koukorava C, et al. Diagnostic reference levels and patient doses in computed tomography examinations in Greece. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2014;163(3):319-24.
  13. Roch P, Célier D, Dessaud C, Etard C. Using diagnostic reference levels to evaluate the improvement of patient dose optimisation and the influence of recent technologies in radiography and computed tomography. European journal of radiology. 2018;98:68-74.
  14. Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL. US diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology. 2017;284(1):120-33.
  15. fur Strahlenschutz B. Bekanntmachung der aktualisierten diagnostischen referenzwerte fur diagnostische und interventionelle rontgenuntersuchungen, Bundesamt fur Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter (2010). 2016.
  16. Yonekura Y. Diagnostic reference levels based on latest surveys in Japan–Japan DRLs 2015. Japanese Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure. 2019.
  17. Bahreyni Toossi MT, Bahrami M. Assessment of patient dose from CT examinations in Khorasan, Iran. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2012;9(4):233-8.
  18. Tavakoli MB, Heydari K, Jafari S. Evaluation of diagnostic reference levels for CT scan in Isfahan. Glob J Med Res Stud. 2014;1:130-4.
  19. Janbabanezhad-Toori A, Deevband M, Shabestani-Monfared A, Abdi R, Nabahati M. Pediatric dose assessment in common CT examination towards establishment of related regional DRL in Mazandaran, Iran. International Journal of Radiation Research. 2016;14(3):251-6.
  20. Khoramian D, Sistani S, Hejazi P. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels arising from common CT examinations in Semnan County, Iran. Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering. 2019;25(1):51-5.
  21. Afzalipour R, Rabi Mahdavi S, Khosravi H, Neshasteh-Riz A, Fatemeh Hosseini A. Evaluation of diagnostic reference dose levels in CT-scan examinations of adolescence in Tehran: a brief report. Tehran University Medical Journal. 2013;71(2).
  22. Afzalipour R, Abdollahi H, Jafari S, Mahdavi SR. A local study on diagnostic reference levels estimation for children computed tomography. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2018;15(Special Issue-12th. Iranian Congress of Medical Physics):26.
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 18, Issue 4
July and August 2021
Pages 247-254

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 04 July 2020
  • Accept Date: 09 July 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics