Status and Trend of Occupational Radiation Exposure in Radiotherapy and Diagnostic X-ray Practices in Bangladesh

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

1 Health Physics Division, Atomic Energy Centre, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

2 Health Physics Division, Atomic Energy Centre, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

Abstract

Introduction: The evaluation of occupational exposure and related trends due to external ionizing radiation in diagnostic and therapeutic purposes has become crucial to understanding the implementation of regulatory acts and technological advancement. This study describes the status of occupational radiation exposure in the radiotherapy (RT) and diagnostic X-ray (DR) sector and the comparison with related research.
Material and Methods: Overall, 12141 radiation workers were monitored using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) read-out by Harshaw TLD Reader (Model 4500) on a quarterly basis. Several parameters such as annual collective effective dose, average annual effective dose, collective and individual dose distribution, and the probability of cancer risk were analyzed.
Results: The number of monitored workers increased by around 35%, whereas the number of radiation workers who received a measurable amount of doses decreased by around 37% during 2014-2018. The annual average effective doses in RT and DR were in the range of 0.017-0.1112 and 0.076-0.1702 mSv, respectively. The results indicate that more than 94% of the total collective dose was for the non-physician group. Among exposed radiation workers, almost 78% received doses below 1mSv and <1% received doses over 15mSv. The annual average effective dose is five times lower than the worldwide average value. Depending on the average occupational dose, the expected number of radiation-induced cancer cases among the monitored workers is below 1.
Conclusion: Dose distribution tends to move towards lower levels and reveals that the majority of the organizations maintain adequate radiation protection.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1.  

    1. Goldman M. Ionizing Radiation and its Risks. West J Med. 1982; 137(6): 540-47.
    2. Sabagh M, Chaparian A. Evaluation of Blood Parameters of the Medical Radiation Workers. Iran J Med Phys. 2019; 16(6): 439-43.
    3. Mettler Jr FA, Upton AC. Medical Effects of Ionizing Radiation 3rd ed. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(2): e30.
    4. Saygin M, Yasar S, Kayan M, Balci UG, Öngel K. Effects of ionizing radiation on respiratory function tests and blood parameters in radiology staff. West Indian Med J. 2014; 63(1): 40-45.
    5. Weizhang W, Wenyi Z, Ronglin C, Liang’an Z. Occupational exposure of Chinese medical radiation workers in 1986-2000. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005; 117(4): 440-3.
    6. VAÑO E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Alfonso F, Macaya C. Occupational Radiation Doses in Interventional Cardiology: a 15-years Follow-up. Br J Radiol. 2006; 79(941): 383-8.
    7. Colgan PA, Currivan L, Fenton D. An assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in Ireland (1996-2005). Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008; 128(1): 12-20.
    8. Basić B, Beganović A, Samek D, Skopljak-Beganović A, Gazdić-Santić M. Ten years of monitoring the occupational radiation exposure in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2010; 139(1-3): 400-2.
    9. Muhogora WE, Byorushengo E, Lema US, Mboya G, Ngatunga JB, Sawe S, et al. Occupational radiation exposure in Tanzania (1996-2010): Status and Trends. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2012; 153(4): 403-10.
    10. Hasford F, Owusu-Banahene J, Amoako JK, Otoo F, Darko EO, Emi-Reynolds G, et al. Assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in medical practice in Ghana (2000-09). Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011; 149(4): 431-7.
    11. Samerdokiene V, Atkocius V, Kurtinaitis J, Valuckas KP. Occupational exposure of medical radiation workers in Lithuania, 1950-2003. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008; 130(2): 239-43.
    12. Al-Abdulsalam A, Brindhaban A. Occupational radiation exposure among the staff of departments of nuclear medicine and diagnostic radiology in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 2014; 23(2): 129-33.
    13. Rahman MS, Begum A, Khan RK, Hoque A, Siraz MMM. Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Interventional Cardiology Practices in Bangladesh during 2010-2014. Malays J Med Biol Res. 2015; 2(2): 127-31.
    14. Rahman MS, Begum A, Hoque A, Khan RK, Siraz MMM. Assessment of whole-body occupational radiation exposures in nuclear medicine practices of Bangladesh during 2010-2014. Iran J Nucl Med. 2016; 24(1): 51-8.
    15. Misbah A, Habib A, Rauf KM, Ali SK, Wajeeha S, Ali SJ, et al. Assessment of Occupational Exposure to External Radiation among Workers at the Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan (2009-2016). Iran J Med Phys. 2017; 14: 197-202.
    16. Linet MS, Kim KP, Miller DL, Kleinerman RA, Simon SL, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Historical review of occupational exposures and cancer risks in medical radiation workers. Radiat Res. 2010; 174(6): 793-808.
    17. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the general assembly of the United Nations with scientific annexes, New York: United Nations sales publication. 2008; E.10.XI.3.
    18. Covens P, Berus D, de Mey J, Buls N. Mapping very low level occupational exposure in medical imaging: a useful tool in risk communication and decision making. Eur J Radiol. 2012 ; 81(9): e962-6.
    19. The Nuclear Safety and Radiation Control (NSRC) Rules-1997 of Bangladesh (SRO No. 205-Law/97); 1997.
    20. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 Recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4). Oxford: Elsevier; 2007.
    21. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. General Safety Requirements Part-3. Vienna: IAEA; 2014.
    22. International Atomic Energy Agency. Assessment of occupational exposure due to external sources of radiation. Safety Guides Series No. RS-G-1.3. Vienna: IAEA; 1999.
    23. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). General principles for the radiation protection of workers. Pergamon Press: Ann. ICRP 27(1); 1997.
    24. Harshaw Model 4500, Manual TLD Workstation Operator’s Manual (Cochran Road, Solon, Ohio) (Pub. No. 4500-0-O-0598-002, 6801); 1998.
    25. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the general assembly of the United Nations with scientific annexes, New York: United Nations sales publication. 2000; E.00.IX.3.
    26. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3). Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1990.
    27. Lochard J. Radiation Risk in Workplace in Perspective. In: Benbow RJ, editor. Proceedings of an International Conference on Occupational Radiation Protection: Protecting Workers against Exposure to Ionizing Radiation; 2002 Aug 26-30; Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Commission; 2003. p. 143-152.
    28. Edith NJ, Philomina OC. Estimation of radiation dose rate of radiological unit personnels in some teaching hospitals in southern Nigeria. Radiat Sci Tech. 2018; 4(4): 22-8.
    29. Bangladesh Atomic Energy Regulatory (BAER) Act-2012 (Act No. 19 of 2012); 2012.
    30. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Ionizing radiation: sources and biological effects. Report to the general assembly of the United Nations with scientific annexes, New York: United Nations sales publication. 1982; E82.IX.8.

     

     

     

     

Volume 18, Issue 6
November and December 2021
Pages 389-396
  • Receive Date: 07 September 2020
  • Revise Date: 22 October 2020
  • Accept Date: 26 October 2020