Dosimetric evaluation of IMRT Step and Shoot/ Sliding and Window (SS / SW) and VMAT Treatment Plans for Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

1 Department of Physics, LPHE, Modeling and Simulations, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco

2 Hassan First University of Settat, High Institute of Health Sciences, Laboratory of Sciences and Health Technologies, Settat, Morocco

Abstract

Introduction: Radiotherapy of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (ORL) sphere is difficult due to complex geometries and very sensitive organs around the target volume. This weapon has benefited from the advances of the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique that combines the advantages of dynamic arc therapy techniques with those of Conformal Radiotherapy with Intensity Modulated (CRIM) by stationary beams.
Material and Methods: The treatment plans of 10 patients were compared and treated with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Step and Shoot (SS), Sliding window (SW), and VMAT (6MV X-ray beam). Three target volumes were used: PTVث Gy, PTV 63 Gy, and PTV 56 Gy. The organs at risk were the spinal cord, the brainstem, the parotid gland. The dose was delivered once a day, five days a week and in 35 sessions in Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB).
Results: The SS technique permitted better parotid sparing, inducting thus to limiting late complications such as xerostomia. The VMAT technique led to better protection of the brainstem by reducing about 6 Gy while for the spinal cord the doses received were almost equal. There was no statistically significant difference between the different techniques.
Conclusion: The results confirm the conformational capacities of these innovative techniques, from a dosimetric and above all clinical point of view as well as their ability to cover the target volumes while largely respecting the constraints on organs at risk.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Lafond C. Analyse et optimisation des performances de la technique VMAT pour son utilisation en radiothérapie (Doctoral dissertation, Rennes 1). 2013.
  2. Eldebawy E, Rashed Y, AlKhaldi M, Day E. A Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2020;17(6):374-9.
  3. Singh H, Gandhi A, Sapru S, Khurana R, Hadi R, Nanda S, et al. Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Postoperative High-Grade Glioma: A Dosimetric Comparison. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2019;16(5):385-91.
  4. Liliane Ramus. Conception et utilisation d’atlas anatomiques pour la segmentation automatique : application à la radiothérapie des cancers ORL. Imagerie médicale. Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, 2011. Français. tel-00845098
  5. Sanda C, Sarafoleanu C. Advantages of VMAT-IMRT technique in nasopharyngeal cancer. Romanian Journal of Rhinology. 2016 Apr;6(22).
  6. Huger S. Adaptation interactive d'un traitement de radiothérapie par imagerie volumique: développement et validation d'outils pour sa mise en oeuvre en routine clinique (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lorraine). 2014.
  7. Manuel de l'exploitant SOMATOM De_nition AS SIEMENS. 2021. Available from : https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-us/computed-tomography/ecoline-refurbished-systems/somatomdefinitionas
  8. 8 Grégoire V, Mackie TR. State of the art on dose prescription, reporting and recording in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (ICRU report No. 83). Cancer/Radiothérapie. 2011 Oct 1;15(6-7):555-9.
  9. [9] Prescribing IC. recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). ICRU report. 2010;83(10):27-40.
  10. Chavaudra J, Bridier A. Definition of volumes in external radiotherapy: ICRU reports 50 and 62. Cancer radiotherapie: journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique. 2001 Oct 1;5(5):472-8.
  11. Grégoire V, Levendag P, Ang KK, Bernier J, Braaksma M, Budach V, Chao C, Coche E, Cooper JS, Cosnard G, Eisbruch A. CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensus guidelines. Radiotherapy and oncology. 2003 Dec 1 ; 69(3) :227-36.
  12. Grégoire V, Eisbruch A, Hamoir M, Levendag P. Proposal for the delineation of the nodal CTV in the node-positive and the post-operative neck. Radiotherapy and oncology. 2006 Apr 1 ; 79(1) :15-20.
  13. Howell R.M., Koontz-Raisig W., Johnstone P.A.S. The trade-off between neutron dose and skin dose for 6 MV versus 18 MV for prostate IMRT : does the 20 cm rule still apply ?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 ; 66 :S678
  14. Agility et InteriM R3.0 Mode d'emploi du mode clinique.ELEKTA. 2012.
  15. Guide Manuel Système MatriXX Evolution IBA. 2022.
  16. Gerard JP, Costa A. Guide des procédures de radiothérapie externe 2007. Société Française de Radiothérapie Oncologique (SFRO), Société Française de Physique Médicale (SFPM), France. 2007.
  17. Teoh M, Clark CH, Wood K, Whitaker S, Nisbet A. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. The British journal of radiology. 2011 Nov;84(1007):967-96.
  18. Verbakel WF, Cuijpers JP, Hoffmans D, Bieker M, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2009 May 1;74(1):252-9.
  19. Vanetti E, Clivio A, Nicolini G, Fogliata A, Ghosh-Laskar S, Agarwal JP, et al. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2009 Jul 1;92(1):111-7.
  20. Guckenberger M, Richter A, Krieger T, Wilbert J, Baier K, Flentje M. Is a single arc sufficient in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for complex-shaped target volumes?. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2009 Nov 1;93(2):259-65.
  21. Rao M, Yang W, Chen F, Sheng K, Ye J, Mehta V, et al. Comparison of Elekta VMAT with helical tomotherapy and fixed field IMRT: plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy. Medical physics. 2010 Mar;37(3):1350-9.
  22. Johnston M, Clifford S, Bromley R, Back M, Oliver L, Eade T. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using simultaneous integrated boost for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma. Clinical Oncology. 2011 Oct 1;23(8):503-11.
  23. Clemente S, Wu B, Sanguineti G, Fusco V, Ricchetti F, Wong J, et al. SmartArc-based volumetric modulated arc therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a dosimetric comparison with both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2011 Jul 15;80(4):1248-55.
  24. Bertelsen A, Hansen CR, Johansen J, Brink C. Single arc volumetric modulated arc therapy of head and neck cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2010 May 1;95(2):142-8.
  25. Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, Palta JR, Rosen I, Sharpe MB, et al. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Medical physics. 2003 Aug;30(8):2089-115.

 

 

 

 

 

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 19, Issue 1
January and February 2022
Pages 31-42

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 November 2020
  • Revise Date: 03 May 2021
  • Accept Date: 13 May 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics