Iranian Journal of Medical Physics

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics

A Novel Automated Method for Analyzing Semen Microscopy Images: Curvelet Paradigm as a Solution for Improving Sperm Detection

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors
Payam Taheri 1
Seyed Vahab Shojaedini 2
1 Faculty of Electrical, Biomedical and Mechatronics Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST), Tehran, Iran.
10.22038/ijmp.2021.55758.1924
Abstract
Introduction: Credible research shows that in many cases, infertility is caused by problems with men's sperm. Therefore, an accurate sperm analysis is a necessity to solve the problem of infertile couples. However, the first step in this analysis is to separate the sperm from the semen, which may not be accurate due to the poor contrast of the captured microscopy images.
Material and Methods: Curvelet transform has been introduced in recent years as an effective tool for object detection in the image processing domain. The most significant advantage of this transform is that it maps the raw image to a new space in which the features are sparser and parallelly more directional. Based on this fact, in this study, this approach is used to more effectively detect sperm in microscopic images. However, intelligent adjustment of the parameters of this mapping plays an important role in strengthening the weaker edges, and therefore in this article, a new method for optimizing the mapping parameters in order to achieve better separation of sperms from the background of the semen image is also proposed and examined.
Results: The comparison of the results obtained from examining the proposed method versus the results of the state of art methods was performed by using the two main criteria including sperm detection rate and false detection rate (i.e., false positives). This comparison clearly indicated the effectiveness of the proposed idea in distinguishing sperms from semen background. When the basis of performance evaluation is based on not detecting even a single false particle, it is observed that the correct sperm detection rate in the proposed method is between 4 and 17 percent higher than alternative methods. However, the false detection parameter itself shows an improvement of 33% to 3% in the proposed method compared to the weakest to the best among alternatives.
Conclusion: Investigating the ROC curve which has been obtained from several examinations showed the effectiveness of the proposed idea over its alternatives either in correct detection of sperms or elimination of false objects. Therefore, the obtained results may lead us to the conclusion that the curvelet transform may be utilized as an effective solution for detecting sperms in low contrast microscopic images of human semen.
Keywords
Microscopy Images
Sperm Detection
Curvelet Framework Nonlinear Mapping Function
Subjects
  1. Ortiz A, Simmons A, Gross A. Infertility: Secrets, Struggles, and Successes. Wise Women Book Collective. 2021.
  2. Evan R, Eaton J. Management of Infertility, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2019.
  3. Kumar R, Singh P. Prevalence and management of infertility in males with GUTB. BJUI Knowledge. 2020.
  4. Satashree P. Oxidative Stress: A Cause of Male infertility. Science Repository. 2020.
  5. Softness KA, Trussler JT, Carrasquillo RJ. Advanced sperm testing. Current Opinion in Urology. 2020 May 1;30(3):290-5.
  6. Garrido N, Rivera R, editors. Practical Guide to Sperm Analysis: Basic Andrology in Reproductive Medicine. CRC Press; 2017 May 25.
  7. Marc AF, Guppy JL, Bauer P, Mulvey P, Jerry DR, Paris DB. Validation of advanced tools to evaluate sperm function in barramundi (Lates calcarifer). Aquaculture. 2021 Jan 30;531:735802.
  8. Opstad IS, Popova DA, Acharya G, Basnet P, Ahluwalia BS. Live-cell imaging of human spermatozoa using structured illumination microscopy. Biomedical Optics Express. 2018 Dec 1;9(12):5939-45.
  9. Mahdavi HS, Monadjemi A, Vafae A. Sperm detection in video frames of semen sample using morphology and effective ellipse detection method. Journal of medical signals and sensors. 2011 Jul;1(3):206.
  10. Susrama IG, Purnama KE, Purnomo MH. Automated analysis of human sperm number and concentration (oligospermia) using otsu threshold method and labelling. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2016 (Vol. 105, No. 1, p. 012038). IOP Publishing.
  11. Xuan ZL, Yan WZ. The sperm video segmentation based on dynamic threshold. In2010 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2010 Jul 11 (Vol. 5, pp. 2444-2448). IEEE.
  12. Nafisi VR, Moradi MH, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Sperm identification using elliptic model and tail detection. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2005 Jun;6:205-8.
  13. Shojaedini SV, Goldar A, Soori M. Correntropy based sperm detection: a novel spatiotemporal processing for analyzing videos of human semen. Health and Technology. 2018 May;8(1):151-8.
  14. Abbiramy VS, Shanthi V, Allidurai C. Spermatozoa detection, counting and tracking in video streams to detect asthenozoospermia. In2010 International Conference on Signal and Image Processing 2010 Dec 15 (pp. 265-270). IEEE.
  15. Tan WC, Mat Isa NA, Mohamed M. Automated human sperm tracking using mean shift-collision detection and modified covariance matrix method. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2020 Oct;79(39):28551-85.
  16. Leung C, Lu Z, Esfandiari N, Casper RF, Sun Y. Detection and tracking of low contrast human sperm tail. In2010 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering. 2010 Aug 21 (pp. 263-268). IEEE.
  17. Shojaedini SV, Heydari M. A new method for sperm characterization for infertility treatment: hypothesis testing by using combination of watershed segmentation and graph theory. Journal of medical signals and sensors. 2014 Oct;4(4):274.
  18. Shojaedini SV, Heydari M. A New Method for Sperm Detection in Infertility Cure: Hypothesis Testing Based on Fuzzy Entropy Decision. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI). 2014 Jul 1;2(2):69-76.
  19. Somasundaram D, Nirmala M. Faster region convolutional neural network and semen tracking algorithm for sperm analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2021 Mar 1;200:105918.
  20. Rahimzadeh M, Attar A. Sperm detection and tracking in phase-contrast microscopy image sequences using deep learning and modified csr-dcf. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.04034. 2020 Feb 11.
  21. Lang S, Liu X, Zhao B, Chen X, Fang G. Focused synthetic aperture radar processing of ice-sounding data collected over the east antarctic ice sheet via the modified range migration algorithm using curvelets. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2015 Feb 24;53(8):4496-509.
  22. Candès EJ, Donoho DL. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences. 2004 Feb;57(2):219-66.
  23. Zhao ZB, Yuan JS, Gao Q, Kong YH. Wavelet image de-noising method based on noise standard deviation estimation. In2007 International Conference on Wavelet Analysis and Pattern Recognition 2007 Nov 2 (Vol. 4, pp. 1910-1914). IEEE.
  24. Roerdink JB, Meijster A. The watershed transform: Definitions, algorithms and parallelization strategies. Fundamenta informaticae. 2000 Jan 1;41(1, 2):187-228.
  25. Arkanfari R, Shojaedini SV. A new method for detecting sperms in microscopy images: combination of zernike moments and spatial processing. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2018;15(4):215-21.
  26. Shojaedini SV, Heydari M. Automatic sperm analysis in microscopic images of human semen: Segmentation using minimization of information distance. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2014;11(Issue):284-93.
  27. Arkanfari R, Shojaedini SV. A new method for detecting sperms in microscopy images: combination of zernike moments and spatial processing. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2018;15(4):215-21.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 19, Issue 2
March and April 2022
Pages 115-124

  • Receive Date 16 February 2021
  • Revise Date 18 May 2021
  • Accept Date 11 June 2021