Iranian Journal of Medical Physics

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics

Analysis of Commissioning Parameters and its Validation of O-Ring Gantry Based Medical Linear Accelerator HalcyonTM for Improved Radiotherapy Technique

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors
ARVIND KUMAR 1
KIRAN SHARMA 2
CHANDI PRASAD BHATT 3
Suresh Yadav 4
SWATI VERMA 5
SOUGATA BASU 5
POOJA DHAUNDIYAL 5
DEEPAK KAUSHIK 5
DINESH Kumar SAROJ 6
Manoj Gupta 5
1 Graphic Era University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 248002 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India 249203
2 Graphic Era University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 248002
3 Sarvodaya Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Faridabad (Delhi/NCR), India 121006
4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College , Bhopal-462001 (M.P.), India
5 Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India 249203
6 Chirayu Cancer Hospital Radiotherapy Depatment Chirayu Medical College Hospital Bhopal Near Bairagarh
10.22038/ijmp.2023.69197.2215
Abstract
Introduction: Popularly, teletherapy (telecobalt/LA) equipment is based on a C-arm gantry system. Recently, a fast O-ring gantry system introduced a medical linear accelerator (LA) to smoothen the workflow of treatment of cancer patients because of the increasing trend of the number of cancer cases over the past few years. This study aimed to analyze the commissioning parameters and validation of the O-ring gantry-based LA for improved radiotherapy techniques.
Material and Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) radiation field analyzer (RFA) used to commission HalcyonTM LA. It is used for measuring percent depth dose (PDD), profiles, and output factors.
Results: TPS data was validated by comparing it with our measured data. Plans per the TG-119 protocol showed good agreement between treatment planning systems (TPS) calculated and measured doses. For patient-specific, QA plans showed good agreement with gamma evaluation criteria.
Conclusion: Commissioning and validation of O-ring gantry system HalcyonTM LA was performed successfully. 
Keywords
Linear accelerator O
ring gantry Commissioning Validation Radiotherapy technique
Subjects
  1. Pokhrel D, Webster A, Mallory R, Visak J, Bernard ME, McGarry RC, et al. Feasibility of using ring-mounted Halcyon Linac for single-isocenter/two-lesion lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 May;23(5):e13555. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13555.
  2. Calmels L, Sibolt P, Åström LM, Serup-Hansen E, Lindberg H, Fromm AL, et al. Evaluation of an automated template-based treatment planning system for radiotherapy of anal, rectal and prostate cancer. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 12;22:30-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.04.001.
  3. Kim MM, Bollinger D, Kennedy C, Zou W, Scheuermann R, Teo BK, et al. Dosimetric Characterization of the Dual Layer MLC System for an O-Ring Linear Accelerator. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1533033819883641. DOI: 10.1177/1533033819883641.
  4. Lim TY, Dragojević I, Hoffman D, Flores-Martinez E, Kim GY. Characterization of the HalcyonTM multileaf collimator system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(4):106-14. DOI:10.1002/acm2.12568.
  5. Gay SS, Netherton TJ, Cardenas CE, Ger RB, Balter PA, Dong L, et al. Dosimetric impact and detectability of multi-leaf collimator positioning errors on Varian Halcyon. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):47-55. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12677.
  6. Arnfield MR, Siebers JV, Kim JO, Wu Q, Keall PJ, Mohan R. A method for determining multileaf collimator transmission and scatter for dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2000;27(10):2231-41. DOI:10.1118/1.1312190.
  7. Sahani G, Sharma SD, Sharma PK, Deshpande DD, Negi PS, Sathianarayanan VK, et al. Acceptance criteria for flattening filter-free photon beam from standard medical electron linear accelerator: AERB task group recommendations. J Med Phys. 2014 Oct;39(4):206-11. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.144482.
  8. Smilowitz JB, Das IJ, Feygelman V, Fraass BA, Kry SF, Marshall IR, et al. AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations - Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):14– DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5768.
  9. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, et al. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4197-212. DOI: 10.1118/1.3190392.
  10. Huq MS, Fraass BA, Dunscombe PB, Gibbons JP Jr, Ibbott GS, Mundt AJ, et al. The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management. Med Phys. 2016 Jul;43(7):4209. DOI: 10.1118/1.4947547.
  11. Teo PT, Hwang MS, Shields WG, Kosterin P, Jang SY, Heron DE, et al. Application of TG-100 risk analysis methods to the acceptance testing and commissioning process of a Halcyon linear accelerator. Med Phys. 2019 Mar;46(3):1341-54. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13378.
  12. Gao S, Netherton T, Chetvertkov MA, Li Y, Court LE, Simon WE, et al. Acceptance and verification of the Halcyon-Eclipse linear accelerator-treatment planning system without 3D water scanning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Oct;20(10):111-7. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12719.
  13. De Roover R, Crijns W, Poels K, Michiels S, Nulens A, Vanstraelen B, et al. Validation and IMRT/VMAT delivery quality of a preconfigured fast-rotating O-ring linac system. Med Phys. 2019 Jan;46(1):328-39. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13282.
  14. Das IJ, Cheng CW, Watts RJ, Ahnesjö A, Gibbons J, Li XA, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):4186-215. DOI: 10.1118/1.2969070.
  15. Netherton T, Li Y, Gao S, Klopp A, Balter P, Court LE, et al. Experience in commissioning the halcyon linac. Med Phys. 2019 Oct;46(10):4304-13. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13723.
  16. Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, LoSasso TJ, Mechalakos JG, Mihailidis D, et al. IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5359-73. DOI: 10.1118/1.3238104.
  17. Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, Moran J, Pawlicki T, Molineu A, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218. Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):e53-e83. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12810.
  18. Kim H, Huq MS, Lalonde R, Houser CJ, Beriwal S, Heron DE. Early clinical experience with varian halcyon V2 linear accelerator: Dual-isocenter IMRT planning and delivery with portal dosimetry for gynecological cancer treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Nov;20(11):111-20. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12747.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 21, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
January and February 2024
Pages 30-39

  • Receive Date 26 November 2022
  • Revise Date 03 March 2023
  • Accept Date 13 March 2023