The Influence of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Quality and Volume CT Dose Index in Head CT Scan Compared To Filtered Back Projection

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

1 School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

2 Department of Radiology Technology, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

3 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Abstract

 
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the image quality and volume dose index of head CT scan between two adaptive statistical iterative reconstructions (ASIR) and the filtered back projection (FBP) algorithms.
Material and Methods: CT number, noise and signal to noise ratio(SNR) for white matter(WM), gray matter(WM), cerebrospinal fluid(CSF( and skull bone were investigated in brain CT scans of 60 patients. All images were reconstructed by FBP and ASIR 40% algorithms. A water phantom was also used to compare the average CT number; noise, signal-to-noise (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between algorithms under different acquisition parameters. Volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and (dose-length product) DLP were obtained from scanner software. Data were analyzed by T-test and Mann-Whitney statistical test with a significance level of less than 0.05.
Results: Image noise of gray matter, CSF and skull bone was significantly lower for ASIR algorithm (P<0.05). The difference in SNR for white matter and gray matter was not significant between the two algorithms but it was higher for CSF and bone for ASIR. In phantom study, Image noise, CTDIvol and DLP in both axial and spiral scan modes were higher for FBP algorithm (P<0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in SNR and CNR between the two algorithms (P>0.05).
Conclusion: ASIR algorithm reduces the dose and image noise in head CT scan compared to the filtered back projection. In addition, using ASIR algorithm the image noise does not increase with lower mA.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Booij R, Budde RP, Dijkshoorn ML, van Straten M. Technological developments of X-ray computed tomography over half a century: User’s influence on protocol optimization. European Journal of Radiology. 2020;131:109261.
  2. Kwan AC, Pourmorteza A, Stutman D, Bluemke DA, Lima JA. Next-generation hardware advances in CT: cardiac applications. Radiology. 2021;298(1):3-17.
  3. United Nations. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. UN; 2011.
  4. Vilela P, Rowley HA. Brain ischemia: CT and MRI techniques in acute ischemic stroke. European journal of radiology. 2017;96:162-72.
  5. Kular S, Martin A. A primer in interpretation of head CT scans. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2019;80(11):C156-C61.
  6. Ebrahiminia A, Asadinezhad M, Mohammadi F, Khoshgard K. Eye lens dose optimization through gantry tilting in brain ct scan: the potential effect of the radiological technologists’ Radiation protection dosimetry. 2020;189(4):527-33.
  7. Rostampour N, Jafari S, Saeb M, Keshtkar M, Shokrani P, Almasi T. Assessment of skyshine photon dose rates from 9 and 18 MV medical linear accelerators. International Journal of Radiation Research. 2018; 16(4):499-503.
  8. Colang JE, Killion JB, Vano E. Patient dose from CT: a literature review. Radiologic Technology. 2007;79(1):17-26.
  9. Tavakoli MB, Jabbari K, Jafari S, Hashemi SM, Akbari M. Evaluating the Absorbed Dose of Skin, Thyroid and Eye in Coronary Angiography CT Imaging and Its Comparison with Conventional Angiography. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. 2011;29(159).
  10. Tavakoli H M, Jabari K, Salman J. SU‐E‐I‐51: Investigation of Absorbed Dose to the Skin, Eyes and Thyroid of Patients during CT Angiography and Comparison with Conventional Angiography. Medical Physics. 2012;39(6Part4):3636-.
  11. Jafari S, Karimi M, Khosravi H, Goodarzi R, Pourkaveh M. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography scanning in hamadan. Journal of Biomedical Physics & Engineering. 2020;10(6):792.
  12. Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. Journal of nuclear medicine technology. 2007;35(4):213-25.
  13. Furlow B. Radiation dose in computed tomography. Radiologic Technology. 2010;81(5):437-50.
  14. Padole A, Ali Khawaja RD, Kalra MK, Singh S. CT radiation dose and iterative reconstruction techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(4):W384-W92.
  15. Hsieh J. Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. 2003.
  16. Hsieh J, Nett B, Yu Z, Sauer K, Thibault J-B, Bouman CA. Recent advances in CT image reconstruction. Current Radiology Reports. 2013;1(1):39-51.
  17. Qiu D, Seeram E. Does iterative reconstruction improve image qual-ity and reduce dose in computed tomography. Radiol Open J. 2016;1(2):42-54.
  18. Vachha B, Brodoefel H, Wilcox C, Hackney DB, Moonis G. Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR). European journal of radiology. 2013;82(12):2222-6.
  19. Guziński M, Waszczuk Ł, Sąsiadek MJ. Head CT: image quality improvement of posterior fossa and radiation dose reduction with ASiR-comparative studies of CT head examinations. European Radiology. 2016;26(10):3691-6.
  20. Wang L, Gong S, Yang J, Zhou J, Xiao J, Gu Jh, et al. CARE Dose 4D combined with sinogram‐affirmed iterative reconstruction improved the image quality and reduced the radiation dose in low dose CT of the small intestine. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2019;20(1):293-307.
  21. Mayo-Smith WW, Hara AK, Mahesh M, Sahani DV, Pavlicek W. How I do it: managing radiation dose in CT. Radiology. 2014;273(3):657-72.
  22. Sherif FM, Said AM, Elsayed YN, Elmogy SA. Value of using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) technology in pediatric head CT dose reduction. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2020;51(1):1-10.
  23. Kim HG, Lee H-J, Lee S-K, Kim HJ, Kim M-J. Head CT: image quality improvement with ASIR-V using a reduced radiation dose protocol for children. European Radiology. 2017;27(9):3609-17.
  24. Romagnoli A, Funel V, Meschini A, Ricci A, Arduini S, Caramanica C, et al. Optimisation of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in total body examination. La radiologia medica. 2012;117(8):1333-46.
  25. Kaul D, Grupp U, Kahn J, Ghadjar P, Wiener E, Hamm B, et al. Reducing radiation dose in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and lower tube potential in computed tomography. European radiology. 2014;24(11):2685-91.
  26. Ghadimi P, Chaparian A, Mahmoodi M, Bagheri J. Influences of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality and dose reduction in coronary computed tomography angiography. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. 2020;37(553):1286-93.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 20, Issue 6 - Serial Number 6
November and December 2023
Pages 328-332

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 January 2023
  • Revise Date: 17 March 2023
  • Accept Date: 27 March 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics