Assessment of Dosimetric Uncertainties in Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy using kilo-voltage Cone-Beam CT

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

1 Department of Physics, Noorul Islam Center for Higher Education, Kumaracoil, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu.

2 Department of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Kumaracoil, Tamil Nadu, India.

10.22038/ijmp.2025.82233.2448

Abstract

Introduction: Liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) presents distinct challenges caused by respiratory and gastrointestinal motion. While deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) reduces respiratory motion, gastrointestinal movement and variability in breath-hold consistency can lead to inaccuracies in tumor localization and sparing of critical organs. This study examines dosimetric uncertainties in liver SBRT with DIBH using kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT).
Material and Methods: In this study, twenty-five liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) cases were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent treatment with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in five fractions. The Varian real-time position management™ (RPM) system was employed for image acquisition and delivery with a 5 mm amplitude interval. Treatment plan verifications were performed using daily CBCT at the treatment isocenter. The Varian SmartAdapt automatic deformable image registration tool was utilized for contour propagation. Different dosimetric parameters, including the planning target volume (PTV) mean dose, maximum dose to the spinal canal, liver 21 Gy sparing volume, maximum dose to luminal organs, and dose received by 10 cc, were compared. Paired t-tests were employed to evaluate significant dosimetric changes with a P-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: Among the 25 patients, the PTV Dmean (mean dose) decreased in all cases, with an average reduction of 2.2% (P<0.001). Random deviations were noted in the 21 Gy sparing volume of the liver (P: 0.374). On average, the maximum dose to the spinal canal decreased by 1.5% (P<0.001), even with target-based matching. The luminal organ's maximum dose and the dose to 10 cc exceeded the planned values by an average of 6% (P<0.001) and 6.9% (P: 0.017), respectively.
Conclusion: Dosimetric uncertainties are influenced by liver deformation from respiratory motion and the unpredictable positions of luminal organs. Even with 5mm interval amplitude gating, liver deformation remains significant.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, Galvin JM, Hinson W, Kavanagh B, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys. 2010;37(8):4078-101.
  2. Suramo I, Päivänsalo M, Myllylä V. Cranio-caudal movements of the liver, pancreas and kidneys in respiration. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1984;25(2):129-31.
  3. Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM, Emery RS, Forster KM, Jiang SB, et al. The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. Med Phys. 2006;33(10):3874-900.
  4. Wagman R, Yorke E, Ford E, Giraud P, Mageras G, Minsky B, et al. Respiratory gating for liver tumors: use in dose escalation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(3):659-68.
  5. Lu L, Ouyang Z, Lin S, Mastroianni A, Stephans KL, Xia P. Dosimetric assessment of patient-specific breath-hold reproducibility on liver motion for SBRT planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(7):77-83.
  6. Yoo S, Yin FF. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(5):1553-61.
  7. Yang Y, Schreibmann E, Li T, Wang C, Xing L. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(3):685-705.
  8. Rong Y, Smilowitz J, Tewatia D, Tomé WA, Paliwal B. Dose calculation on kV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the Hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration. Med Dosim. 2010;35(3):195-207.
  9. Giacometti V, King RB, Agnew CE, Irvine DM, Jain S, Hounsell AR, et al. An evaluation of techniques for dose calculation on cone beam computed tomography. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1096):20180383.
  10. Giacometti V, Hounsell AR, McGarry CK. A review of dose calculation approaches with cone beam CT in photon and proton therapy. Phys Med. 2020;76:243-76.
  11. Gong H, Liu B, Zhang G, Dai X, Qu B, Cai B, et al. Evaluation of Dose Calculation Based on Cone-Beam CT Using Different Measuring Correction Methods for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023;22:15330338221148317.
  12. Vickress J, Rangel Baltazar MA, Afsharpour H. Evaluation of Varian's SmartAdapt for clinical use in radiation therapy for patients with thoracic lesions. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(3):150-6.
  13. Huang P, Yu G, Chen J, Ma C, Qin S, Yin Y, et al. Investigation of dosimetric variations of liver radiotherapy using deformable registration of planning CT and cone-beam CT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jan;18(1):66-75.
  14. Varian Medical Systems. TrueBeam technical reference guide volume 2: imaging P1033684-002-B. Palo Alto, CA: Varian Medical Systems, Inc. 2022.
  15. The Phantom Laboratory Catphan ® 504 Manual; Greenwich NY12834; 2013.
  16. Miften M, Vinogradskiy Y, Moiseenko V, Grimm J, Yorke E, Jackson A et al. Radiation Dose-Volume Effects for Liver SBRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;110(1):196-205.
  17. T S, Madeswaran S. The Dosimetric Comparison of Different SBRT Techniques for Treatment of Liver Cancer Using Flattened and Flattening Filter Free Beam. Iran. J. Med. Phys.2022; 19(6): 371-82.
  18. Thaper D, Yadav HP, Sharma D, Kamal R, Singh G, Oinam AS, et al. Degree of reduction in normal liver complication probability from free-breathing to breath-hold liver SBRT: a dose-escalation strategy using radiation dose-volume effect. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021;8(1).
  19. Oliver PAK, Yewondwossen M, Summers C, Shaw C, Cwajna S, Syme A. Influence of intra- and interfraction motion on planning target volume margin in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy using breath hold. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020;6(1):100610.
  20. Lu L, Ouyang Z, Lin S, Mastroianni A, Stephans KL, Xia P. Dosimetric assessment of patient‐specific breath‐hold reproducibility on liver motion for SBRT planning. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2020 Jul;21(7):77-83.
  21. Sarria GR, Schmitt H, Jahnke L, Bürgy D, Wenz F, Siebenlist K, et al. Cone Beam CT-Based Daily Adaptive Planning or Defined-Filling Protocol for Neoadjuvant Gastric Cancer Radiation Therapy: A Comparison. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 13;6(1):100593.
  22. Padgett KR, Simpson G, Asher D, Portelance L, Bossart E, Dogan N. Assessment of online adaptive MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver cancers. Phys Med. 2020 Sep;77:54-63.
  23. Weykamp F, Katsigiannopulos E, Piskorski L, Regnery S, Hoegen P, Ristau J, et al. Dosimetric Benefit of Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 8;14(24):6041.
  24. Farzanegan Z, Zabihzadeh M. Artifact reduction techniques in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging modality. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2018 Dec 1;15(Special Issue-12th. Iranian Congress of Medical Physics):240-.
  25. Rossi M, Cerveri P. Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Approaches for the Generation of Synthetic CT from Cone-Beam CT. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(8):1435.
  26. Joseph J, Singh A, PN P, PB J, Puzhakkal N. Cone beam computed tomography enhancement using feature‐embedded variational autoencoder with a perceptual loss function. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology. 2023 Sep;33(5):1767-78.

 

 

 

 

 

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 22, Issue 1
January and February 2025
Pages 14-18

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 31 August 2024
  • Revise Date: 31 January 2025
  • Accept Date: 09 April 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics