Assessment of an Unshielded Electron Field Diode Dosimeter for Beam Scanning in Small- to Medium-Sized 6 MV Photon Fields

Document Type : Original Paper


1 1- Center for Research in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 2- Physics Unit, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Student Research Committee, and Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Physics Unit, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 Department of Medical Radiation and Radiation Research Center, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran


Radiotherapy planning systems require many percentage depth dose (PDD) and profile measurements and there are various dosimeters that can be used to obtain these scans. As dose perturbation is particularly troublesome in smaller photon fields, using a low-perturbation, unshielded electron field diode (EFD) in these fields is of interest. The aim of this work was to investigate the suitability of an unshielded diode for beam scanning in 3×3 cm2, 5×5 cm2, and 10×10 cm2, 6 MV fields.
Materials and Methods
An EFD was used for all the scans. For comparisons in profile measurements, a tungsten-shielded photon field diode (PFD) was also used. PDDs were measured using the PFD and an RK ionization chamber. Results
Very good agreement (0.4%) was found between the PDDs measured with EFD and PFD for the two larger fields. However, the difference between them exceeded 1.0% slightly for the smallest field, which may be attributed to the effect of the larger PFD perturbation. The RK chamber PDDs around 10 cm depth were 1-2% lower than those measured with the diodes. There was good agreement (
The EFD generally agrees well with the PFD and may even perform better in smaller fields.


Main Subjects

  1. Bedford J, Childs P, Hansen VN, Mosleh-Shirazi M, Verhaegen F, Warrington A. Commissioning and quality assurance of the Pinnacle3 radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons. Br J Radiol. 2003;76(903):163-76.
  2. Stephans KL, Xia P, Tendulkar RD, Ciezki JP. The current status of image-guided external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2010 May;20(3):223-8.
  3. Minniti G, Saran F, Traish D, Soomal R, Sardell S, Gonsalves A, et al. Fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy following conservative surgery in the control of craniopharyngiomas. Radiother Oncol. 2007;82(1):90-5.
  4. Mosleh-Shirazi MA. Radiotherapy techniques for intracranial tumours. J Radiat Res. 2006;4(2):53-62.
  5. Mosleh-Shirazi MA, Hansen VN, Childs PJ, Warrington AP, Saran FH. Commissioning and implementation of a stereotactic conformal radiotherapy technique using a general-purpose planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004;5(3):1-14.
  6. Das IJ, Cheng CW, Watts RJ, Ahnesjö A, Gibbons J, Li XA, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008;35(9):4186-215.
  7. Ramm U, Licher J, Moog J, Scherf C, Kara E, Böttcher HD, et al. In Vivo Dosimetry with Semiconducting Diodes for Dose Verification in Total-Body Irradiation. Strahlenther Onkol. 2008;184(7):376-80.
  8. Mosleh-shirazi A, Karbasi S, Shahbazi-Gahrouei D, Monadi S. A Monte Carlo and experimental investigation of the dosimetric behavior of low- and medium-perturbation diode used for entrance in-vivo dosimetry in megavoltage beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(6):326-38.
  9. Laub WU, Wong T. The volume effect of detectors in the dosimetry of small fields used in IMRT. Med Phys. 2003;30:341-7.
  10. Low DA, Parikh P, Dempsey JF, Wahab S, Huq S. Ionization chamber volume averaging effects in dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy beams. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1706-11.
  11. Bouchard H, Seuntjens J. Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams. Med Phys. 2004;31(9):2454-65.
  12. Sánchez-Doblado F, Andreo P, Capote R, Leal A, Perucha M, Arráns R, et al. Ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power ratios for radiosurgery and IMRT beams. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48(14):2081-99.
  13. Djouguela A, Grießbach I, Harder D, Kollhoff R, Chofor N, Rühmann A, et al. Dosimetric characteristics of an unshielded p-type Si diode: linearity, photon energy dependence and spatial resolution. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 2008;18(4):301-6.
  14. Saini AS, Zhu TC. Temperature dependence of commercially available diode detectors. Med Phys. 2002;29:622–30.
  15. Saini A, Zhu T. Dose rate and SDD dependence of commercially available diode detectors. Med Phys. 2004;31(4):914-24.
  16. Rikner G, Grusell E. Selective shielding of a p-Si detector for quality independence. Acta Oncol. 1985;24(1):65-9.
  17. Griessbach I, Lapp M, Bohsung J, Gademann G, Harder D. Dosimetric characteristics of a new unshielded silicon diode and its application in clinical photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 2005;32(12):3750-4.
  18. Higgins P, Alaei P, Gerbi B, Dusenbery K. In vivo diode dosimetry for routine quality assurance in IMRT. Med Phys. 2003;30(12):3118-23.
  19. Lee HR, Pankuch M, Chu JC, Spokas JJ. Evaluation and characterization of parallel plate microchamber’s functionalities in small beam dosimetry. Med Phys. 2002;29(11):2489-96.
  20. Scott AJD, Nahum AE, Fenwick JD. Using a Monte Carlo model to predict dosimetric properties of small radiotherapy photon fields. Med Phys. 2008;35(10):4671-84.