Assessment of Occupational Exposure to External Radiation among Workers at the Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan (2009-2016)

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

1 Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine IRNUM, Peshawar Pakistan

2 Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine (IRNUM), Peshawar, Pakistan

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment of occupational exposure to external radiation and the analysis of associated trends are imperative to observe changes that have taken place over time due to regulatory operations or technological advancements. Herein, we describe the occupational radiation exposure to workers employed in Nuclear Medicine (NM), Radiotherapy (RT), and Diagnostic Radiology (DR) departments at the Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Peshawar, Pakistan, and to evaluate the related trends during 2009-2016.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the dose records of 4320 film dosimeters was performed during 2009-2016. The analyzed quantities included annual collective effective dose, annual average effective dose, distribution of workers, and their annual average effective doses in various effective dose intervals, as well as the maximum and minimum annual individual effective doses.
Results: The annual average effective doses in RT, NM, and DR were within the ranges of 1.07-1.45, 1.25-1.55, and 1.03-1.60 mSv, respectively. The majority (90%) of the workers received effective doses in the interval of 1-4.99 mSv, while 10% of the workers received doses within the range of the minimum detectable level-0.99 mSv.  The minimum and maximum annual individual effective doses were 0.30 mSv and 3.96 mSv as recorded in RT and NM, respectively. The annual average effective doses measured for NM, RT, and DR were 1.39, 1.23, and 1.30 mSv, respectively. These values are comparable with the worldwide annual average effective doses.
Conclusion: All the workers received doses below the annual dose limit. The status and trends of doses showed that radiation protection conditions were adequate.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. References

     

    1. Bhatt C, Ween B. Occupational radiation exposure monitoring among radiation workers in Nepal. In Proceedings of the 12th Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association in Buenos Aires.2008; pp. 19-24.
    2. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the general assembly of the United Nations with scientific annexes, New York: United Nations sales publication. 2000; E.00.IX.3.
    3. Motevalli SM, Borhanazad AM. Assessment of occupational exposure in medical practice in Tehran, Iran. Rom Rep Phys. 2015 Jan 1; 67(2): 431-8.
    4. International Atomic Energy Agency. safety standards series: Occupational radiation protection. Safety guide No RS-G-1.1. Vienna, IAEA;1999.
    5. International Atomic Energy Agency. Assessment of occupational exposures due to external sources of radiation. Safety Guides Series No. RS-G-1.3. Vienna: IAEA; 1999.
    6. International Atomic Energy Agency. International Basic Safety Standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources (Safety Series No. 115). Vienna: IAEA; 1996.
    7. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3). Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1990.
    8. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 Recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP.Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2- 4). Oxford: Elsevier; 2007.
    9. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. General safety requirements part-3. Vienna:IAEA; 2014.
    10. Muhogora WE, Byorushengo E, Lema US, Mboya G, Ngatunga JB, Sawe S, et al. Occupational radiation exposure in Tanzania (1996–2010): status and trends. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2012 Jul 13:ncs125. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs125.
    11. Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Ordinance F.No.2(2)/2001-Pub. Ordinance No. III of 2001, The Gazette of Pakistan, Jan. 2001.
    12. Authority PN. PNRA Regulations on radiation protection (PAK/904). Islamabad Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Athority. 2004.
    13. Rahman MS, Begum A, Hoque A, Khan RK, Siraz MM. Assessment of whole-body occupational radiation exposures in nuclear medicine practices of Bangladesh during 2010-2014. Iran J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan 1;24(1):51-8.
    14. Jabeen A, Munir M, Khalil A, Masood M, Akhter P. Occupational exposure from external radiation used in medical practices in Pakistan by film badge dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2010 Aug 1;140(4):396-401. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq134.
    15. Al-Haj AN, Lagarde CS. Statistical analysis of historical occupational dose records at a large medical center. Health phys. 2002 Dec 1;83(6):854-60.
    16. Samerdokiene V, Atkocius V, Ofomala R. Radiation exposure received by the medical radiation workers in Lithuania at The Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, 2004–2011. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013 Nov 1;157(1):152-7. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct111.
    17. Masood K, Zafar J, Zafar T, Zafar H. Assessment of the occupational radiation exposure doses to workers at INMOL Pakistan (2007–11). Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013 Jun 1;155(1):110-4. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs306.
    18. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the general assembly of the United Nations with scientific annexes, New York: United Nations sales publication. 2008; E.10.XI.3.
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 14, Issue 4
November and December 2017
Pages 197-202

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 16 March 2017
  • Revise Date: 05 August 2017
  • Accept Date: 14 August 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics