Threshold of Linear and Non-Linear Behavior of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in Skin, Fat, and Muscle Tissue Using Computer Simulation

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors

Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

 
Introduction: In this study, the ultrasound-tissue interactions to obtain the resulting treatment thermal plans of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) are simulated.
Material and Methods: The simulations were performed for three layers of skin, fat, and muscle using Comsol software (version 5.3). The acoustic pressure field was calculated using the Westervelt equation and was coupled with Pennes thermal transfer equation to obtain thermal distribution. The pressure field was calculated and compared in two linear and non-linear models.
Results: By increasing the input sound intensity, the non-linear behavior becomes more pronounced and higher harmonics of the fundamental sound have appeared and increased the pressure, and temperature at the focal point. At input intensities of 1.5, 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, and 30 W/cm2, the maximum acoustic pressure in the non-linear model compared to the linear model was 10, 11, 15, 22, 40, 47, 65, and 85%, respectively. The maximum temperature in the non-linear model increased by 9, 10, 12, 20, 22, 24, 31, and 45% compared to the linear model. Model results were validated with experimental results with a 95% correlation coefficient. The results of the input intensity 1.5, 2 and 5 W/cm2 were acceptable (p<0.05) and from input sound intensity 8 W/cm2 to above, there was a significant difference between the data (p<0.05). Also, maximum pressure and maximum temperature in the non-linear model are 20% more than in the linear model.
Conclusion: In the non-linear propagation model, the resulting thermal pattern changed significantly with the change of the input sound intensity.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Al-Bataineh O, Jenne J, Huber P. Clinical and future applications of high intensity focused ultrasound in cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2012; 38(5): 346-353.
  2. Park JH, Lim SD, Oh SH, Lee JH, Yeo UC. High‐intensity focused ultrasound treatment for skin: ex vivo evaluation. Skin Res Technol 2017; 23(3): 384-391.
  3. Clarke RL, Bush NL, ter Haar GR. The changes in acoustic attenuation due to in vitro heating. Eur J Ultrasound 2003; 29(1): 127-135.
  4. Ter Haar G, Coussios C. High intensity focused ultrasound: Physical principles and devices. Int J Hyperther 2007; 23: 89-104.
  5. Wójcik J, Gambin B. Theoretical and numerical aspects of non-linear reflection–transmission phenomena in acoustics. Appl Math Model 2017; 46: 771-784.
  6. Persson J, Hansen E, Lidgren L, McCarthy I. Modeling of the heat distribution in the intervertebral disk. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31(5): 709-717.
  7. Han H, Lee H, Kim K, Kim H. Effect of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in conjunction with a nanomedicines-microbubble complex for enhanced drug delivery. J Control Release 2017; 266: 75-86.
  8. Martinez R, Vera A, Leija L. Finite element HIFU transducer acoustic field modeling evaluation with measurements. Pan Am Health Care Exchanges conference (PAHCE) 2012: 101-104.
  9. Omena TP, Fontes-Pereira AJ, Costa RM, Simões RJ, von Krüger MA, de Albuquerque Pereira WC. Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study. J Ther Ultrasound 2017; 5: 3-9.
  10. Bailey MR, Khokhlova VA, Sapozhnikov OA, Kargl SG, Crum LA. Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (a review). Acoust Phys 2003; 49(4): 369-388.
  11. Haddadi S, Ahmadian MT. Analysis of nonlinear acoustic wave propagation in HIFU treatment using Westervelt equation. Scientia Iranica B 2018; 25(4): 2087-297.
  12. Martínez R, Vera A, Leija L. HIFU induced heating modelling by using the finite element method. Phys Procedia 2015; 63: 127-133.
  13. Guntur SR, Choi MJ. Influence of temperature-dependent thermal parameters on temperature elevation of tissue exposed to high-intensity focused ultrasound: numerical simulation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41(3): 806-813.
  14. Grisey A, Heidmann M, Letort V, Lafitte P, Yon S. Influence of skin and subcutaneous tissue on high-intensity focused ultrasound beam: Experimental quantification and numerical modeling. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42(10): 2457-2465.
  15. Samanipour R, Maerefat M, Nejad HR. Numerical study of the effect of ultrasound frequency on temperature distribution in layered tissue. J Therm Biol 2013; 38(6): 287-293.
  16. Van Sloun RJ, Pandharipande A, Mischi M, Demi L. Compressed sensing for beam formed ultrasound computed tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62: 1-5.
  17. Comley K, Fleck NA. A micromechanical model for the Young’s modulus of adipose tissue. Int J Solids Struct 2010; 47(21): 2982-2990.
  18. Bhowmik A, Repaka R, Mishra SC. Thermal analysis of the increasing subcutaneous fat thickness within the human skin: A numerical study. Numer Heat Trans: A Appl. 2015; 67(3): 313-329.
  19. Okabe T, Fujimura T, Okajima J, Aiba S, Maruyama S. Non-invasive measurement of effective thermal conductivity of human skin with a guard-heated thermistor probe. Int J Heat Mass Trans 2018; 126: 625-635.
  20. Soneson JE, Myers MR. Thresholds for nonlinear effects in high-intensity focused ultrasound propagation and tissue heating. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2010; 57: 2450-2459.
  21. Suomi V, Jaros J, Treeby B, Cleveland RO. Full modeling of high-intensity focused ultrasound and thermal heating in the kidney using realistic patient models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2017; 65(5): 969-979.
  22. Gupta P, Srivastava A. Numerical analysis of thermal response of tissues subjected to high intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Hyperther 2018; 35(1): 419-434.
  23. Leighton TG. What is ultrasound? Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2007; 93: 3-83.
  24. Hoffelner J, Kaltenbacher M. Finite element simulation of nonlinear wave propagation in thermoviscous fluids including dissipation. Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2001; 48(3): 779-786.
  25. Mohammadpour M, Firoozabadi B. Numerical study of the effect of vascular bed on heat transfer during high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of the liver tumor. J Therm Biol 2019; 86: 102431.
  26. Namakshenas P, Mojra A. Microstructure-based non-Fourier heat transfer modeling of HIFU treatment for thyroid cancer. Comput Meth Prog Biol 2020; 197: 105698.
  27. Abdolhosseinzadeh A, Mojra A, Hooman K. A porous medium approach to thermal analysis of focused ultrasound for treatment of thyroid nodules. Appl Acoust 2021; 182: 108236.
  28. Kim J, Jung J, Kim M, Ha K, Lee E, Lee I. Distribution of temperature elevation caused by moving high-intensity focused ultrasound transducer. JPN J Appl Phys 2015; 54(7S1): 07HF13.
  29. Gholami M, Haghparast A, Dehlaghi V. Numerical study for optimizing parameters of high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced thermal field during liver tumor ablation: HIFU Simulator. Iran J Med Phys 2017; 14(1): 15-22.
  30. Ebrahiminia A, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Toliyat T. Dual frequency cavitation event sensor with iodide dosimeter. Ultrason Sonochem 2016; 28: 276-282.

 

 

 

 

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 19, Issue 3
May and June 2022
Pages 181-188

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 July 2021
  • Revise Date: 12 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 23 November 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics