Iranian Journal of Medical Physics

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics

On Prediction of Cardio-Pulmonary Complications during Hypofractionated versus Conventional Fractionated Regimens of Left Breast Radiation Therapy Using Monte Carlo and Collapsed Cone Convolution Based Algorithms

Document Type : Original Paper

Authors
Sepideh Omidvar 1
kamal mostafanezhad 2
Ahad Zeinali 1
1 Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
2 Omid Research and Treatment Center, Urmia, Iran
10.22038/ijmp.2022.62939.2066
Abstract
Introduction: Due to the challenge of choosing the optimal treatment regimen as well as the accurate dose calculation algorithm (DCA), this study aimed to evaluate the DCAs to compare the conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CFRT) and hypofractionation radiotherapy (HFRT) of breast cancer (BC) in the prediction of cardio-pulmonary complications.
Material and Methods: For 19 patients with left-sided BC, treatment regimens, CFRT (50Gy/25frs) vs. HFRT (42.5Gy/16frs), were simulated. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and tumor control probability (TCP) values for each regimen using radiobiological models were calculated via Monte Carlo (MC) and Collapsed Cone Convolution (CCC) algorithms. For statistical comparison of the results obtained from the regimens and algorithms, the t-test and Wilcoxon test were used in SPSS Statistics. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.
Results: The mean NTCP and TCP calculated in CFRT and HFRT were as follows: cardiac mortality (MC: CFRT=0.0374±0.0134 vs. HFRT=0.0173±0.0066; p<0.001) and (CCC: CFRT=0.0373±0.0134 vs. HFRT=0.0168±0.0064; p<0.001), pneumonitis (MC: CFRT=0.1201±0.0322 vs. HFRT=0.0756±0.0221; p<0.001) and (CCC: CFRT=0.1131±0.0310 vs. HFRT=0.0697±0.0120; p<0.010), and TCP (MC: CFRT=0.9979±0.0087 vs. HFRT=0.9997±0.0092; p=0.593) and (CCC: CFRT=0.9982±0.0029 vs. HFRT=0.9986±0.0016; p=0.821).
Conclusion: The comparison of CFRT and HFRT using MC and CCC algorithms showed that the risk of cardiac mortality and pneumonitis in CFRT was significantly higher than in HFRT, and TCP was not significantly different in the two regimens. Applications of MC-based DCAs along with suitable biological parameters can help physicists in the prediction of radiation-induced complications accurately and precisely.
Keywords
Breast Neoplasms Pulmonary Heart Disease Radiation Dose Hypofractionation Radiotherapy Planning Computer
Assisted
Subjects
  1. Mehnati P, Ghorbanipoor M, Mohammadzadeh M, Motlagh BN, Mesbahi A. Predicting the Risk of Radiation Pneumonitis and Pulmonary Function Changes after Breast Cancer Radiotherapy. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2021;11(4):459.
  2. Vasiljevic D, Arnold C, Neuman D, Fink K, Popovscaia M, Kvitsaridze I. Occurrence of pneumonitis following radiotherapy of breast cancer–A prospective study. Strahlenther Onkol. 2018;194(6):520-32.
  3. Mondal D, Jhawar SR, Millevoi R, Haffty BG, Parikh RR. Proton versus photon breath-hold radiation for left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: a dosimetric comparison. Int J Part Ther. 2020;7(3):24-33.
  4. James M, Swadi S, Yi M, Johansson L, Robinson B, Dixit A. Ischaemic heart disease following conventional and hypofractionated radiation treatment in a contemporary breast cancer series. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018;62(3):425-31.
  5. Appelt AL, Vogelius IR, Bentzen SM. Modern hypofractionation schedules for tangential whole breast irradiation decrease the fraction size-corrected dose to the heart. Clin Oncol. 2013;25(3):147-52.
  6. Nozaki M, Kagami Y, Shibata T, Nakamura K, Ito Y, Nishimura Y, et al. A primary analysis of a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, confirmatory trial of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery in Japan: JCOG0906. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49(1):57-62.
  7. Li J, Xiong W, Freedman GM, Anderson P, Ma C. Comparison of TCP and NTCP between conventional and hypofractionated breast treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(1):S395.
  8. Astudillo V A, Paredes G L, Resendiz G G, Posadas V A, Mitsoura E, Rodriguez L A, et al. TCP and NTCP radiobiological models: conventional and hypo fractionated treatments in radiotherapy. 2015.
  9. Gay HA, Niemierko A. A free program for calculating EUD-based NTCP and TCP in external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med. 2007;23(3-4):115-25.
  10. Gagliardi G, Lax I, Soderstrom S, Gyenes G, Rutqvist LE. prediction of excess risk of long-term cardiac mortality after radiotherapy of stage I breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1998;46(1):63-71.
  11. Sheng Y, Wang W, Huang Z, Wu X, Schlegel N, Zhang Q, et al. Development of a Monte Carlo beam model for raster scanning proton beams and dosimetric comparison. Int J Radiat Biol. 2020;96(11):1435-42.
  12. Hasani M, Mohammadi K, Ghorbani M, Gholami S, Knaup C. A Monte Carlo evaluation of dose distribution of commercial treatment planning systems in heterogeneous media. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(8):127.
  13. Jones D. ICRU Report 50: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements. 1994: 833-4.
  14. Wambersie A. ICRU Report 62: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU Report 50). International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements. 1999.
  15. Seppenwoolde Y, Lebesque JV, de Jaeger K, Belderbos JS, Boersma LJ, Schilstra C, et al. Comparing different NTCP models that predict the incidence of radiation pneumonitis. Normal tissue complication probability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(3):724-35.
  16. Okunieff P, Morgan D, Niemierko A, Suit HD. Radiation dose-response of human tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32(4):1227-37.
  17. Bufacchi A, Caspiani O, Rambaldi G, Marmiroli L, Giovinazzo G, Polsoni M. Clinical implication in the use of the AAA algorithm versus the AXB in nasopharyngeal carcinomas by comparison of TCP and NTCP values. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15(1):1-8.
  18. Chaikh A, Khamphan C, Kumar T, Garcia R, Balosso J. What should we know about photon dose calculation algorithms used for radiotherapy? Their impact on dose distribution and medical decisions based on TCP/NTCP. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2016;4(4):4418.
  19. Liang X, Penagaricano J, Zheng D, Morrill S, Zhang X, Corry P, et al. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:10.
  20. Gloi AM. A broad evaluation of left breast radiotherapy. Am J Biomed Sci. 2019;11(3).
  21. Moghaddasi L, Reid P, Bezak E, Marcu LG. Radiobiological and Treatment-Related Aspects of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(6):3366.
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Volume 20, Issue 3
May and June 2023
Pages 168-176

  • Receive Date 13 January 2022
  • Revise Date 10 June 2022
  • Accept Date 02 July 2022